by Scott Creighton
While Hillary Clinton met with 22 world leaders to decide the fate of Libya, they kept Barack Obama in the back of the bus and let real president take the lead.
Last weekend President Peace Prize played his 61st round of golf while in office and then on Monday he attended a fund raiser while Hillary Clinton was secretly meeting with the leader of the opposition in Libya asking them to fake shooting down a plane so that the Coalition of the Craven would have an excuse to attack on Saturday.
People are dying in Bahrain and Yemen and just like 2009 when Israel launched Operation Cast Lead on the Gaza strip killing 1,400 Palestinians and over 300 children, President Peace Prize doesn’t appear to give a shit.
Today alone, based on the fabricated stories of Libyan military attacking a rebel stronghold, we have launched 110 Tomahawk Cruise missiles against various targets inside Libya. Libyan’s are reporting civilian casualties.
And where is Obama? He’s using Air Force One and Marine One to take his family down to Rio sporting their fine, coordinated yellow outfits, while he leaves proven war-monger and globalist servant, Hillary Clinton, in charge to discuss the fate of yet another Middle Eastern nation.
“Libya was pummeled today by more than 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles in the first phase of an assault by international forces intent on protecting civilians from attack by their leader Muammar Qaddafi and his loyalists.” Bloomberg
I have never seen a president more disinterested in the affairs of state than Barack Obama seems to be. While GOP governors busy themselves trying to pass unprecedented fascist bills throughout the country, Barry just goes on taking vacations and watching basketball games. While people are getting mowed down in Bahrain and Yemen for standing up for democracy, the good president just keeps attending gala dinners and making feeble, meaningless statements designed to buy him some cover while he does nothing and people die.
The health-care bill that they came up with that did the greatest service to the insurance and pharmaceutical industries was actually Hillary’s plan from back when she was pretending to run against Barack in 2008. The White House is staffed with nothing but Clinton regime neoliberal retreads. And now, when the world seems poised and ready to make a “CHANGE” President Obama is content with letting a proven war-monger take the lead and do everything in her craven power to crush it, in his name.
Let’s just face it folks - these people hate democracy and all they did was prepare a product, Barry Obama, to make us THINK we got something different in 2008.
But in reality, unelected Hillary Clinton runs this country.She’s as much of a dictator as her good friend Mubarak and Ben Ali were.
After Haiti, she took charge and handed over the 9 billion dollar rebuilding and rescue fund to her husband, Bill, who is the one person who was most responsible in the world for the shambles that Haiti had been in before the disaster.
Now we have Hillary gleefully rubbing her crotch up against the president of France and skipping across the tarmac making a fool of herself.  It doesn’t matter to them because the left in this country won’t do a damn thing anyway no matter how much she obviously likes waging war on yet another country. The Clintons spent 5 million dollars in the middle of the Great Recession, to hitch-up their daughter to one of the Goldman Sachs scum that destroyed the economy … and they were lavished with praise for it on the left.
Hillary and the rest of the globalists have launched yet another war based on still more obvious lies and it seems the left can’t do enough to heap praise on them for doing it.
Sometimes I think the people of this country deserve what’s coming. Sometimes I think they deserve to be slaves to their fascist heroes. Perhaps the Clintons are right; maybe Americans are too stupid and too self-absorbed to be trusted with democracy.
Filed under: Uncategorized |
Well, I’m torn on that last part. The serious part of me thinks that’s a little extreme. But the ever-present dark comedy part of me totally agrees; if you have the means to find the nasty truth that is staring you in the face, yet you turn it down because you are too wimpy or lazy, then yeah, you are not only deserving of your fate, but also dangerous to everyone, including yourself.
Meanwhile, those of us who are not brainwashed and determined to live meaningful and productive lives where we do not submit to plutocrats and wealthy murderers and scumbags will continue to fight back. Excellent articles Scott! Keep it up!
Also, looking back, I shudder when I think of how I actually used to look up the US government and people like the Clintons. If not for outsides sources like this and tireless work of people who fight for goodness and truth, I could be one of the many zombies out there… sometimes I don’t know what is worse: being a zombie, or knowing the truth and being unable to do anything about it ďż˝?ďż˝
“…sometimes I don’t know what is worse: being a zombie, or knowing the truth and being unable to do anything about it”
Excellent, Greenmon, that is a superb question!
From an existentialist perspective the worst is knowing the the truth and being one of the damned (like the people of Libya in this case) on which upon this harsh truth is being exercised. Then again in a bitter irony people like these are the only ones that have had the “enlightenment” of understanding, in both spirit and body, the true nature of this sad world.
Makes you wonder if the elected president (Obama) is not only a puppet but a scared one. Maybe he meant what he said when he ran for election but then he felt the gun pointed at his head and maybe his children… maybe he is afraid to be what he wanted to be. Maybe he is a victim.
Then again…… probably not…. he still signs everything…. he could at least put out a note saying he is being held hostage by the Clintons….. boy… maybe that would stir up Americans…..
then maybe not…..
That’s really funny Jan. If he wrote a note what would it say? How about “Help! I’m being held prisoner in a Chinese laundry front for a neoliberal think tank”
This piece is still missing something Scott…It’s Hillary’s official globalist skank label. Wear it proud Killary.
Forget potassium iodine pills. They won’t protect us from Cesium 137 or these people. I suggest making sure you have your cyanide pill handy instead. One final thought: Who will drop humanitarian bombs on the white house to save Libyan civilians… and the rest of the world for that matter?
Scott,
I probably should apologize for breaking my stated “intention” to not comment here again. But I keep reading you.
* I like your choice of news stories.
* Clearly, you are a strong thinker and strong writer.
I just wish you would graduate from U.S.-bashing and rise to attacking the Rothschild-jew network.
It’s entertaining to say Clinton is the “real” president. But she is not the boss. No American is the boss. Up the chain of the Rothschild-jew network we find the real boss.
Who owns or controls all the major media, all major banks in the U.S. and around the world, who created Communism, who has owned the international drug trade for a century, who established the United Nations, and who established Israel?
The Rothschild family and their jew henchmen, along with a handful of nonjew henchmen, are at the top of it all. The American criminals are horrible, but they are not the directors of the criminality at the top of the USA and the world.
Next year, we have a big election. It’s possible for The People to finally overturn the fully corrupted system in our country. But we have to unify against the Common Enemy, not focus on Americans against Americans.
I wish you would help in that goal.
Fascists or simply people who accomplish what has to be done?
Their methods are sometimes blunt but with WMD being so easy to manufacture, I notice many scientists are on their hols, needs must! The oil will flow!
The “real boss” is a consensus. Eventually, it will be world wide. Those who are unable or unwilling to state what they think will be allowed to live with the rest of the sheep!
You know James, you would get a lot further in your efforts if you stuck to talking about the corrupting influence the Rothchilds have had over the centuries without lacing your comments with statements like “their jew henchmen”
Unless your intention is to give people 1. an easy reason to dismiss your otherwise valuable input or 2. give others a reason to dismiss sites like mine as “antisemitic”… perhaps you should think about the value, the real value, of statements like these.
If you want to focus on the Rothchilds, fine. Every damn isn’t “the Rothchilds”, but if that is where you are, so be it. This thread is about how the anti-democratic globalists use the Obama frontman as cover for an unelectable war-monger who is actually running this country, politically speaking.
We all know she is nothing more than the hitman for a group of well placed corporate and banking interests, and one of those, ONE, are the Rothschild family. But like the other commenter aptly explained, this is a consensus, ie, the Washington Consensus, it’s a fascist ideology that has permeated this country and many others. To focus on but ONE family is a bit naive, even though they are historically part of the beginning of it, they are not ALL of it.
But, focus on what you will.
But I am going to ask you one time and one time only, comment here as you wish, but leave out slurs like “their jew henchmen”…
If you wish to talk about Israeli policy, fine. If you wish to talk about zionism, fine. There is a difference, and you know it.
Comments like the one you left above do you no good, they do your efforts no good, and they do my site no good. I have two rules here, no threats of violence and no racial/ethnic/religious slurs. Banning is the remedy for such infractions. I certainly hope it doesn’t come to that.
Thanks Shawn, and you are right! The perfect place for him to drop a “rescue me’ note …. would be in with his laundry! It works in the movies!
Thank you, Scott. Then, in reply, my final comment will be to try to show that I am two things:
1. Not afraid of the charge of “anti-semitic” because that term is an absurdity created by the very people who use it to tar and feather even the careful, honest people who hit on the truth. Many kinds of people are “semitic,” not only the jews. We don’t say somebody is “anti-semitic” when they are anti-Palestinians, but Palestinians are “semitic” too. See? BTW, Everybody can talk about certain kinds of Moslems, certain kinds of Christians, etc., but it’s untouchable to talk about certain kinds of jews. Ridiculous. But since they own the media ….
2. I am always careful to use qualifiers to show I never mean to include all jews.
So long, Scott.
[…] is painfully obvious these days is that alternative media icons are helping spread Clinton’s Karl Rovesque hawkish fantasies about Libya, just like they also helped back in the lead-up to Iraq days, in order to help justify more […]
[…] knew full well of what he spoke. Journalist Scott Creighton’s Mar. 19, 2011 article, “President Hillary Clinton’s Shock and Awe,” began with this stark […]
[…] knew full well of what he spoke. Journalist Scott Creighton’s Mar. 19, 2011 article, “President Hillary Clinton’s Shock and Awe,” began with this stark contrast. “While […]
[…] knew full well of what he spoke. Journalist Scott Creighton’s Mar. 19, 2011 article, “President Hillary Clinton’s Shock and Awe,” began with this stark contrast. “While […]
[…] knew full well of what he spoke. Journalist Scott Creighton’s Mar. 19, 2011 article, “President Hillary Clinton’s Shock and Awe,” began with this stark contrast. “While […]
[…] knew full well of what he spoke. Journalist Scott Creighton’s Mar. 19, 2011 article, “President Hillary Clinton’s Shock and Awe,” began with this stark contrast. “While […]
[…] knew full well of what he spoke. Journalist Scott Creighton’s Mar. 19, 2011 article, “President Hillary Clinton’s Shock and Awe,” began with this stark contrast. “While […]
[…] knew full well of what he spoke. Journalist Scott Creighton’s Mar. 19, 2011 article, “President Hillary Clinton’s Shock and Awe,” began with this stark contrast. “While […]
[…] knew full well of what he spoke. Journalist Scott Creighton’s Mar. 19, 2011 article, “President Hillary Clinton’s Shock and Awe,” began with this stark contrast. […]
[…] knew full well of what he spoke. Journalist Scott Creighton’s Mar. 19, 2011 article, “President Hillary Clinton’s Shock and Awe,” began with this stark contrast. “While […]
[…] knew full well of what he spoke. Journalist Scott Creighton’s Mar. 19, 2011 article, “President Hillary Clinton’s Shock and Awe,” began with this stark contrast. “While […]
[…] knew full well of what he spoke. Journalist Scott Creighton’s Mar. 19, 2011 article, “President Hillary Clinton’s Shock and Awe,” began with this stark contrast. “While […]