Jody Hice Asked for an Investigation into the FBI’s Hillary-favoring Process? Okay. Here’s a Starter Pack

by Scott Creighton

Anyone who follows the work of this independent investigator knows I do not suffer the “there is no motive” line lightly. There is ALWAYS a motive even with the criminally insane. In the case of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) there is no insanity defense as they know exactly what they are doing as they collude with other agencies and political parties to undermine democracy in this country. There is a reason they are doing this… a “why”… a motive.

And the evidence is already out there… if you actually care take a look under a few moss covered stones. You might not like what you find. But it’s out here.

Recent revelations in the Mueller investigation and questions about the behavior of and motivations held by certain agency investigators are leaving some intrepid, well-schooled journalists here in the states scratching their heads wondering how the devil is it possible that a flagship organization like the beloved Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) could possibly have stooped so low as to abuse both their authority and their resources in an effort to thwart American “democracy” during the 2016 presidential elections.

Such affectations of outrage and shock leave this mildly schooled writer convulsing in uncontrollable, breathless laughter. Sadly, it is the maniacal laughter of the doomed, is it not?

For over 40 years, the FBI crime lab in Quantico had believed that lead alloys used in bullets had unique chemical signatures. It was analyzing the bullets with the goal of matching them chemically, not only to a single batch of ammunition coming out of a factory, but also to a single box of bullets. The National Academy of Sciences conducted an 18-month independent review of comparative bullet-lead analysis. In 2003, its National Research Council published a report whose conclusions called into question 30 years of FBI testimony. It found the analytic model used by the FBI for interpreting results was deeply flawed, and the conclusion, that bullet fragments could be matched to a box of ammunition, was so overstated that it was misleading under the rules of evidence. One year later, the FBI decided to stop conducting bullet lead analyses.[51]

After a 60 Minutes/Washington Post investigation in November 2007, two years later, the Bureau agreed to identify, review, and release all pertinent cases, and notify prosecutors about cases in which faulty testimony was given.[52]

For forty years the agency routinely practiced a kind of scientific kabuki theater show in courtrooms across the country convincing ignorant jurors with their Special Agent slight of hand trick that suspects were guilty and that they had the special evidence to prove it.

When their sleazy little trick was exposed as a lie, they stopped performing their ‘water into wine’ courtroom magic trick but refused to examine the thousands of cases where they used this trumped up evidence to imprison their suspects, guilty or not.

In fact, they resisted any kind of self evaluation of their trickery for another 2 years after they were exposed to the country and the world on 60 Minutes leaving wrongfully convicted Americans to rot in prison just a little longer.

And this wasn’t simply a few “bad apples” at the top sending inappropriate text messages to one another during a political smear campaign of an “investigation”… this was a systemic cancer eating away at the heart of the agency resting atop the Justice System of the United States of America. It was a foundational program upon which many hundreds if not thousands of their convictions over 40 years were built.

And it was a lie.

A lie for the “greater good” they might have reasoned… but a lie nonetheless. One that was known by and readily accepted by hundreds if not thousands of FBI employees and agents over the course of that time frame. Not one of which ever came forward and said “hey. there is something wrong going on here”

Let that sink in for a second.

Later this morning I will address the specific allegations against specific individuals involved in what I consider (and have written about for over a year) to be one of the most intrusive acts of disruption ever carried out by the FBI against our home nation. After careful consideration and extensive research, it is my opinion that the FBI in collusion with other U.S. agencies (with help from the “5 Eyes” agencies across the Westernized world) and the political party that was in power at the time, conspired against the opposition party (which I am certainly not a part of) in order to achieve their stated goal (stated by the head of that party at the time as well as by some of the FBI agents and the head of CIA at the time as well) which was the coronation of Hillary Clinton on Jan. 20th 2017.

I will address that topic later this morning via a collection of my previous work coupled with the recent developments in the Mueller/RussiaGate probe that left our “intrepid journalists” scratching their collective heads.

But for the moment let us ask how it is that such well educated investigators find it “shocking” that the FBI may possibly have misused their power and authority in such a way and to that I simply have to ask “Are you kidding?”

Wikipedia is constantly being edited by the thought police (the FBI for one) who wish to make sure some discourse is allowed but only enough to provide the illusion of transparency because of course we know that is an important part of maintaining the illusion of democracy. However, even with that as a given and proven hypothesis, the cleaned up, ready for prime-time version of the FBI’s Wikipage (which they would certainly focus on) still has a number of FBI controversies listed on it that provide a good opening baseline for the creation of a better understanding of just what the agency is.

Even the FBI’s own self-edited (see 10.9) Wikipage is chocked full of controversies that should have, in a decent society, spelled the end of the agency decades ago. They were formed to inform on the American public… not the mob, which they refused to acknowledge even existed for decades. Hiding bad shootings, colluding with mobsters, cointelpro, murders of dissident leaders in Latin America, spying on uppity Puerto Ricans, destroying evidence of Hillary Clinton’s corruption… these are but a few of the contributions made by the central pillar of the American Justice System.

As a famous football coach once said “You are what your record says you are” and that couldn’t be more true when it comes to this team of pretend do-gooders… and I don’t care how many ridiculous propaganda movies Hollywood churns out to whitewash the blood and the stank of corruption from their grubby little man hands (kinda like the one they recently did on the White Helmets?)

But as bad as that record they themselves left on their Wikipage expose them to be… it pales in comparison to the forbidden truth about the vaunted FBI. The truth they work to this very day to obscure from the American public like their jobs and even their lives depend on it.

We will get into the 375 texts from Peter Strzok and Lisa Page in a follow-up article. Texts that established them as “conservative” Democratic party operatives with an unmitigated hatred for Trump and Sanders alike. We will get into the hand-picked team of 20 “intelligence agency professionals from 3 different agencies” who colluded with one another to undermine the incoming president of the United States weeks before he took office on the orders of (and payment from) the outgoing president. We will get into the head of the Special Investigation, Robert Mueller, who stuffed his staff with Clintonites and Democratic Party donors as they looked for anything and everything they could throw at the wall of the fake-populist president hoping something might just stick. And we will get into the history of the collusion between the Clinton campaign, the Obama administration, the British intelligence networks, the “5 Eyes” domestic spying racket, Fusion GPS and a complicit media ready willing and able to publish and regurgitate any and all speculation and innuendo from these assets in their never-ending quest to shape the new administration’s foreign policy to fit their globalist desires.

(some of my previous work on the subject…just for the record:)

We will get into all of that next… but for now, lets take a look at just one example of the FBI’s corrupt resume and lets try to figure out how it is all these reporters keep pretending to be shocked by anything undemocratic they do over there in their hallowed halls of justice.

The FBI, Benghazi and the Clinton Email Cover-up

Why is it that Director James Comey lied to congress when he said Huma Abadin emailed thousands of State Department files to Anthony Weiner’s laptop for him to print for her? Why is it that no one mentions that undisputed FACT when talking about Trump firing him?

“The FBI issued an official letter to congress regarding James Comey’s May 3rd 2017 testimony in which they say he “mispoke” regarding the Huma Abedin emails found on Anthony Weiner’s laptop. That’s the same laptop that prompted James Comey’s Oct. 28th announcement that he had to reopen the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s illegal use of a personal server.

I myself wrote on  May 4th James Comey’s Explanation of the Clinton Emails on Weiner’s Computer is Total Absolute Bunk”  me, on my birthday, May 10, 2017

Why did Obama’s DOJ assign Peter Kadzik to work on the new Clinton email investigation with the FBI when Kadzik was known to be a close friend of John Podesta and married to woman who worked for Bill Clinton?

“We assure you that the Department will continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resource and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible,” Peter Kadzik

And why is it that the FBI, in one form or another, continued to give Hillary Clinton one break after another when it came to their investigation into her and her illegal email server and all those missing emails from her time as Secretary of State?

“Is this now a Justice Department that prosecutes individuals?” Perry, of Pennsylvania, said at the press conference. “Folks, this is how police states are started. This is how it begins. And it has to stop.”

Hice, who represents parts of Georgia, said, “It is clear that Hillary Clinton’s received break after break after break from the FBI…. Everyone ought to be treated equally under the law, regardless of who they are.” He called for “an investigation into the FBI’s process and procedures.” Newsweek, Nov. 6, 2017

Is it possible that they weren’t necessarily covering up for Hillary’s wrong-doings but rather, their own?

In 2014 the House Benghazi Committee was formed to investigate the U.S. government’s role in the Sept. 11th 2012 attack on one of our embassies in Benghazi, Libya. Several emails surfaced from Hillary Clinton’s account related to that event leading congressional investigators to request all remaining related communications from Hillary’s State Department. It was then and only then that her exclusive use of an illegal private server to conduct official U.S. business was discovered. All of her official emails were then subpoenaed by congress, a request she refused at first. Clinton had three of her underlings (Cheryl Mills (Clinton’s former chief of staff), David Kendall (Clinton’s longtime personal lawyer), and Heather Samuelson ) sort through all the emails on her private server (the ones not already destroyed) and submit 30,000 or so of them to the State Department for inclusion in the official record of Hillary’s time in office. Another 30,000 or more were deemed “personal” by Hillary’s lackeys and were kept from public record (for a comprehensive breakdown of the specifics of this case, see this)

Clearly this was criminal behavior in and of itself on a grand scale by the former Secretary of State. But perhaps more troubling still is that it is indicative of even greater crimes, perhaps collusion, corruption and/or crimes against humanity conducted by Hillary Clinton while serving at the behest of Barack Obama.

But the FBI gave her a pass and in the end, so did the MSM, the fake left party of America and virtually everyone else who has let her essentially (and perhaps literally) get away with murder… so she could run for an even higher office.

Why the hell would they do that?

One answer may be that the FBI themselves were complicit in Hillary’s crimes in Benghazi back in 2012. And the fact that those events resulted in the deaths of 4 American citizens makes it nearly impossible for a complicit accomplice to hold her accountable without doing the same of themselves.

I wrote years ago about the Benghazi psyop and it’s connection to Clinton’s State Department and the FBI.

The whole thing hinged on a video created by someone Max Blumenthal named as “Sam Bacile”, a “jew” supposedly, who hated Muslims. The film, “Innocence of the Muslims”, was given the reason the “spontaneous” attack in Benghazi took place which was a story pushed by Max the day after the attack, but apparently written the same day as the attack, based on information fed to him by his father, Sidney Blumenthal, a life-time Clinton sycophant, hatchet-man and servant.

That was the story Hillary made the State Department stick with for weeks after the attack in spite of the fact that it made no sense and the fact that the preparations for the attack were witnessed by people on the ground in Benghazi long before the video was released on Youtube.

Max Blumenthal’s lie was spoonfed to him to publish by the Clinton team on the ground in Libya (where Sidney was working for Hillary looking for business opportunities) and then did so in order to provide Hillary cover for the event. A prefabricated pretext of an excuse.

But the truth in the old days of the open and free internet (may not be that way for long folks) will out, as they say, and rouge investigative journalists like myself started uncovering the truth of the matter pretty quickly.

Turns out “Sam Bacile” was actually not a Jew at all and he wasn’t particularly mad at anyone… other than the U.S. Justice Department who had busted him multiple times for things like the manufacturing of meth and violations of his parole.

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula has been a “fed snitch” since his 2009 arrest. read The Smoking Gun article…

The Smoking Gun uncovers the fact that Nakoula had worked out some sort of deal with Federal authorities to get a lighter sentence but the details of which have been sealed by the courts. They also show that Nakoula was released from prison in late 2010 to live at a halfway house, but he violated the terms of his parole and ended up going back inside til June or July of 2011. When he came out, he immediately began working on his honeypot trap.” me, Sept. 14th, 2012 (two days after event and one day after Max Blumenthal’s incredibly wrong article)

“Sam’s” real name was Nakoula Basseley Nakoula and he was a Coptic Christian and he was tasked years ago with making a film for an FBI sting operation as part of his 2011 plea deal. The film was called “The Innocence of Bin Laden” and it was used as a honeypot to entrap “radical Muslims” in California or at least they TRIED to use it as such… but no one showed up.

The original title was “The Innocence of Bin Laden,” which the filmmaker expected would attract an audience of radical Islamists who would become disillusioned about their faith after watching, Klein said.

Sam had a crew of people passing out fliers around the dangerous mosques in California, trying to get these folks who love Osama Bin Laden who would come to cheer Osama Bin Laden,” Klein said. “But the movie was going to expose all the stuff that Muhammad really did, like murder and pedophilia and stuff like that.”

The movie had one theatrical showing at a cinema on Sunset Boulevard in Hollywood, Klein said.

“I got there about a half hour before the movie started and stayed a half hour after it started and I saw zero — nada, none, no people — go inside,” Klein said.

The lack of interest in the movie left the filmmaker depressed and embarrassed, Klein said. He said he didn’t know how much the budget was or who gave money for production. He said he didn’t invest. ”  San Fransisco Chronical

There is no question as to the origin of this film, what it was and why it was made.

“Raimondo does point out (as I did days ago) that convicted meth dealer, bank fraudster and FBI snitch Nakoula was released from prison just weeks before starting in on this little project, which is very odd considering the nature of the film and having to use a fake identity to make it would violate the terms of his probation.

Now Nakoula is safely tucked away and the State Department is demanding that no reporters ask questions about the case until they can come up with a better story.” me, Sept. 19th, 2012

The FBI has a long history of using criminals as informants and operatives in various sting operations in this country especially after 9/11 and especially when it comes to their “investigations” into “radical Muslims” in America. What we see here is a classic example of it. No doubt. No question. That’s what it is.

However, Clinton’s attempt to distance the U.S. from “Innocence of Muslims”–and, by extension, its felonious producer–may be complicated by the revelation that Nakoula Basseley Nakoula became a government informant after his 2009 arrest for bank fraud, The Smoking Gun has learned.” The Smoking Gun, Sept. 14th 2012

The ONLY question and the most IMPORTANT question that remains is this one: how did the film get released on Youtube hours before an attack in Benghazi where the attackers (many of whom were paid disrupters from the Libya destabilization campaign) were already making preparations for the attack?

The FBI had the only copies of the film. It was slightly retooled for the Youtube release and renamed but they were in possession of it. Or, more accurately, the Obama Justice Department was in possession of it.

Which means.. since we know there were preparations already taking place before the release of the video on Youtube and we know Max was spoonfed that story from his Clintonite father right at the time the attack took place… it certainly seems someone, someone who controlled that video, deliberately released it at that particular moment in time… to COVER FOR THE ATTACK.

“The way these perpetrators acted and moved — I think we, and they’re choosing the specific date for this so-called demonstration, I think we have no, this leaves us with no doubt that this was pre-planned, determined,”

It was planned, definitely, it was planned by foreigners, by people who entered the country a few months ago, and they were planning this criminal act since their arrival,” Libyan President Mohamed Yousef El-Magariaf

And then, in the aftermath, once the story started breaking down (largely due to an open and equal internet which is about to be shuttered) the Clinton crime gang issued a decree of silence:

All aspects of the attack, including what led up to it, its causes, the identity of the perpetrators, and the circumstances surrounding the death of Amb. Chris Stevens and the other three Americans,are off limits for reporters.” Foreign Policy Magazine

I wonder if anyone from Hillary’s team made any communications with someone at Justice or even the FBI regarding “The Innocence of the Muslims”

I wonder if any of those communications might just have been some of those “personal emails” Hillary had destroyed.

Now do you understand why the FBI might have been inclined to cut Hillary a break on the email scandal?


When you think about these recent events unfolding this week in congress, all this talk about how the FBI colluded with other agencies and the “5 Eyes” international domestic spying program and the Obama administration, it’s hard too understand their possible motivation to stick their collective necks on the chopping block as simply a desire to pick one political party over another.

I mean lets face it, we have had an FBI and one form of domestic spying intelligence agency in this country for a century or so and this is the first time I can remember any of them getting so involved in the obstruction of democracy in an election in the past. Sure they try to pick winners and losers but they have never gone so far as to fabricate evidence, leak unsubstantiated claims and undertake entire investigations of bogus fictional crimes like they have in the past year and a half (started just after Hillary stole the nomination)

Why? Their desire for continuity and “stability” when it comes to the corrupt foreign policy of the previous administration couldn’t possibly explain this far reaching criminal enterprise being carried out by the Justice Department and the FBI. Not by a long shot.

So why did they do it?

Perhaps they did it because after eight years of American Gladio domestic false flag operations and the FBI subsequent white-washing “investigations” into all of them, they were concerned about the possible outcome of a new administration coming to power who might not see such events as serving the “greater good” like the previous one did.

Perhaps those who really pull the strings of our political puppets, what I call the masters of the universe, decided no matter what they weren’t going to let an accidental president rule over a populist-leaning population for it would set the wrong precedent and send the wrong message about their absolute control over all of us mud people over here in the Shining City on the Hill.

Or perhaps the simplest answer is the most accurate one:

the FBI was just as complicit in some of Hillary’s crimes as she was and the ONLY way to make sure they didn’t come to light… was to advance her to a higher office… the only office in the country high enough to expose their crimes.

I could have written about any number of criminal actions committed by the FBI over the years. From the execution of a key witness in the Boston Bombing case, to the framing of Bruce Ivins in the Amerithrax anthrax case, to their involvement in Waco (with a nifty new white-washing Hollywood piece coming out this week), to the betrayal and murder of John O’Neill, to Mueller being brought in to head the FBI right before the 9/11 attack, to the myriad of questions surrounding the WTC 1993 bombing and all their connections to the bomb-maker, to cointelpro and their collusion with the mob for decades.

Instead I focused on two very simple, very undeniable cases that need no ‘conspiracy theories” to prove them:

  1. the FBI’s willingness to railroad thousands of suspects with fake evidence over the course of decades
  2. the FBI’s involvement with Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi attack.

Both cases go straight to the core of what the FBI has become… an agency that believes it is above the law in America. Above the law and willing to do whatever it takes for what they perceive as “the greater good”

Scott Perry had it right in that quote from Newsweek above… this is how police states start and why we have to stop it. Of course, it’s already been a police state to some degree for quite a while now but at least someone is starting to pay attention… if but a little.

Jody Hice asked for an investigation? Okay. Here’s her starter pack. Let’s see if they really want to turn over some mossy stones to see what lies beneath.

Please help if you can

Independent journalism depends on viewer support.

You can click on the nifty gif thingy for PayPal or contact me via email ( for my home address.

Thank you very much.


9 Responses

  1. Great article, Scott.

  2. I took the liberty of forwarding this to the Duke of Orange with a caveat…
    I’m sure it will get read now & all will be well…

  3. well, if they do this thing, a lot of people will be cancelling their internet. a lot of money will be going ‘by by’ from the internet companies.

    • A combined bar and internet cafe sounds mighty tempting in this day and age. Plus there’s a ton of empty mall space to play with nowadays.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: