Donald’s “red line” same as Obama’s: War-monger Trump Hints at New Chemical Weapons False Flag in Syria

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE 2: please see important update at end of article

UPDATE: Trump’s main-man, Jared Kushner, just got back from a trip to Israel where he met with Bibi. I wonder if this sudden spate of Israeli false flag mortars and rocket-fire used to justify attacking the Syrian military and the Palestinians in Gaza has anything to do with that meeting. I wonder if this new false flag chemical weapons attack does as well. Inquiring minds want to know.

Bibi got Jared to stand with him in front of the same map he and Nikki posed in front of. Gee, I wonder what the (obvious) hidden message is in that?

Image result for Netanyahu. Kushner

First, a little background on the state of the Syrian regime change op, Greater Kurdistan and the history of false flag “red-lines”

Years ago, when the regime change operation in Syria looked like it was over because the Syrians were kicking our Wahhabist terrorist contractors out of their country, then president Obama issued a warning of sorts to the Syrian government; don’t use chemical weapons on your people because if you do, we will use it as an excuse to start bombing on behalf of our contractors.

Of course, the contractors then used chemical weapons and Obama tried to blame Assad and was poised to invade the country with just the justification he needed… when all of a sudden the dreaded open internet started producing evidence that the attack didn’t actually come from the Syrian army but instead from the same al-Qaeda linked terrorists we’ve been supporting all along.

And President Obama backed down.

Back in April a similar situation developed when Syrian forces hit a location that was occupied by some more of our contractors and they decided on the fly to call up their al-Qaeda linked White Helmets and stage a “chemical weapons attack” aftermath video or two which was then used by our military generals as the pretext for them attacking a Syrian airbase, directly attacking Syrian military targets, on purpose, for the first time in the conflict. I write “on purpose” because the glorious generals “accidentally” attacked Syrian forces once before during the previous administration’s rule when Obama and Kerry struck a deal with the Russians regarding “ISIS” (more contractors) and they wanted to see that plan nixed. Of course it wasn’t an accident and numbers of U.S. military officials should have been fired and brought up on charges for that one… but they weren’t largely because they feel they run the country today along with the intelligence industry’s Deep State planners.

As the Syrian regime change operation winds down and the Syrian army moves closer and closer to both the Iraqi border AND the north-eastern half of the country currently occupied by the Kurdish land-grabbing operation (our new “freedom fighters” in the same mold as the Contras and al-Qaeda) suddenly the Greater Kurdistan project looks like it’s on it’s last leg. Syria, aided by the Russians, Hezbollah and Iran, are retaking their country in a massive push in spite of the fact that President Trump has freed up his bloodthirsty generals to attack Syrian military targets at will if they dare target our contractors as we let them slip from one devastated city to the next.

A couple weeks ago the military planners decided to attack a Syrian fighter jet as it attacked “ISIS” operators we were letting leave Raqqa so they could go terrorize some other city in Syria.

Clearly those military planners were hoping Syria would retaliate with a direct attack on U.S. soldiers or material but they didn’t. Instead, the Russians turned on their air-aircraft battery systems and told the U.S. they would be “lighting up” our planes in the western half of the country if they dared fly there again. So we didn’t and our bloodthirsty generals didn’t get the pretext they were looking for to launch an all out invasion on behalf of al-Qaeda and the Kurds.

On June 19th, the National Review, a war-mongering neocon rag, reported that as “ISIS” faded into memory in Syria, the U.S. military planners were going to be looking to justify a full on invasion of the eastern portion of the country. Presumably so we can hand it over the glorious Kurds to make up the western chunk of Greater Kurdistan.

If and when we defeat ISIS in Iraq and Syria, what comes next? Ideally, American allies would defeat the world’s most vicious terrorists, the warring parties in Syria would then have the space to reach a political settlement, and a genocidal civil war would finally end. Yet when ideals meet the hatred and confusion of the Middle East, ideals always lose. So rather than staring peace in the face, we’re not only raising the risk of direct and sustained confrontation with Syria (and its chief ally, Russia), we’re inching toward an outright invasion and extended occupation of northern Syria. All without congressional approval. All without meaningful public debate. National Review, June 19th, 2017

In spite of what some lower level military leader said the other day, we are in the “land grabbing business” and have been for a very long time. At least, that’s what David French seems to be suggesting at the National Review which of course is backed up by even the most cursory reading of our real history going all the way back to Gen. Smedley Butler.

Day before yesterday Seymour Hersh published an article in a German paper claiming he had evidence that the U.S. intelligence agencies and the troops on the ground knew full well there had been no chemical attack back in April but the Trump administration went forward with the attack on the Syrian base all the same.

“Some American military and intelligence officials were especially distressed by the president’s determination to ignore the evidence. ‘None of this makes any sense,’ one officer told colleagues upon learning of the decision to bomb. ‘We KNOW that there was no chemical attack … the Russians are furious. Claiming we have the real intel and know the truth ... I guess it didn’t matter whether we elected Clinton or Trump.'” Die Welt.

The Hersh piece is getting a lot of press yesterday and today though it really doesn’t tell us in the alternative journalism world anything we didn’t know months ago. Anything we didn’t know immediately after the staged videos hit the airwaves.

Seymour’s article is based on the transcript of an exchange between some anonymous soldier and an anonymous intel asset and it reads like it was written by an anonymous publicist.

The other thing that makes his work highly suspect in my opinion is that it claims the victims were “collateral damage” from the Syrian conventional airstrike who were then used as props in the making of the “chemical weapons attack” videos by al-Qaeda’s White Helmets. Truth is, our terrorist contractors had just taken a number of civilians hostage as they fled a conflict zone to the south of the position that was hit by Syrian military and it was those hostages, likely killed by our contractors NOT ASSAD, who ended up being used as the victims in the videos.

However accurate Seymour’s work is on the specific details (which means a lot when you think about who probably wrote the script for the two used by Hersh) fact is, word has gotten out that the Trump administration’s intel chiefs knew there had been no chemical weapons attack carried out by the Syrian government PRIOR to their attack on the airfield. Which makes for some potentially difficult discussions for President Trump in the coming days.


Today they’ve dug back into their old bag of tricks, pulling out their trusty “chemical weapons red-line” gimmick.

The White House warned Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Monday that he and his military would “pay a heavy price” if it conducted a chemical weapons attack and said the United States had reason to believe such preparations were underway.

The White House said in a statement released late on Monday the preparations by Syria were similar to those undertaken before an April 4 chemical attack that killed dozens of civilians and prompted U.S. President Donald Trump to order a cruise missile strike on a Syrian air base.

“The United States has identified potential preparations for another chemical weapons attack by the Assad regime that would likely result in the mass murder of civilians, including innocent children,” White House spokesman Sean Spicer said.

“If … Mr. Assad conducts another mass murder attack using chemical weapons, he and his military will pay a heavy price,” he said. Reuters, June 27th, 2017

The timing of this statement couldn’t be more obvious. We are losing in Syria. We are losing on the Grand Chessboard in the game for Greater Kurdistan. And the whole of the American population is distracted while the Republicans debate back and forth about which phony crippling “tax breaks disguised as health care” bill they are going to put forward to be defeated in the senate.

Our friends over in Israel are steadily attacking the Syrian army in pursuit of their goals which are: stealing Golan Heights once and for all and establishing a Greater Kurdistan for their friends and business partners the Barzani clan of Iraqi Kurdistan.

Nikki Haley, the first Trump administration official to tout the fabricated “chemical weapons attack” last April as justification to attack the Syrian government, is already screeching about engaging in more war on behalf of her Israeli friends. Unfortunately for Nikki, she’s not smart enough to know her Tweet is giving away the deception right off the bat.

Let me rephrase that a little:

“Any further false flag attacks done to the people of Syria
will be blamed on the government of Syria in order to advance
our agenda and those of our good friends in Israel”

A couple weeks ago Nikki went over to Israel to tell the world the big-meaning UN was bullying Israel when they do things like tell the Israelis to stop bombing civilians in Gaza. Here is a photo of her fawning over Bibi. Bibi told Nikki it’s time to break up the UN Relief and Works Agency which has schools and aid stations in Gaza. Need to get those do-gooder witnesses out of the strip so Bibi can bomb without recourse. Nikki agreed.

Image result for nikki haley bibi netanyahu

I wonder if that’s the map they used to plan the next chemical weapons false flag attack?

The Reuters report on the president’s statement claims the intel this is all based on comes from U.S. sources AND some from other nations. Gee, I wonder who that could be.

Need I mention the Liberty?

So we have another false flag event in the making and this time it looks like they might actually use chemical weapons rather than depending on the power of theatricality which the White Helmets do so well for them.

Of course, it makes ABSOLUTELY no sense for the Syrian government to launch chemical weapons attacks on their own people right at the time when the regime change operation is doomed to fail and they are about to push the greedy Kurds out of cities in the east they took over after “KurdISIS” did their dirty little deeds and flushed the majority of the Syrians out into the streets.

Just like last time however, the Israeli Hasbara assets working in the MSM will CERTAINLY try to counter that logical fallacy in their plan by saying “yeah, that means Assad feels free to do whatever he wants to his people now, to teach them a LESSON”

Going back to the June 20th National Review article, we have to remember, as “ISIS” falters and our al-Qaeda teams in the east are routed from under the rocks they’ve been hiding under… the military planners who run this country are faced with a decision: let peace replace the chaos we’ve been creating over there or step up their efforts and find a justification, ANY JUSTIFICATION, to give them cover for an all out invasion. Even if that justification is obviously a false flag event.

This is the problem when you give the generals (ones named “Mad Dog” for example who have already committed crimes against humanity in Iraq) the authority to call his own shots in foreign policy decisions. Because that is exactly what he is doing.

The problem is, our military is bought and paid for. Bought by the military industrial complex. Bought by foreign nations. Bought by Big Business and Banking who make TONS of cash when we go to war and make NOTHING when peace breaks out.

That’s why the founding fathers decided to put the military decision making under civilian control… control which President Trump has willfully abdicated because he knows his options were to oppose nation building, like he promised during the campaign… or betray his base ONCE AGAIN which promises to reduce his poll numbers to an even lower historic level.

Whether or not they will actually commit the false flag event is almost irrelevant because in terms of terrorism, it is the “use of violence OR THE THREATENED USE OF VIOLENCE against a civilian population…” and make no mistake, the government of Syria and it’s people certainly understand the threat right now.

It’s terrorism. It’s already terrorism. The Syrians are winning and the Deep State and their allies in certain foreign countries are resorting to the same old monstrous tactics they’ve used for decades to get what they want.

Trump’s “red-line” is nothing more than a re-tooling of Obama’s and it looks like, at least for now, that the Duke of Orange is going to go along with it just like his predecessor did.

Does make one question in that Seymour Hersh piece seem pretty relevant though, doesn’t it? Who does run this country? The banks? The Deep State? The glorious generals? Or the Likudniks from Tel Aviv?

Whatever your answer, it isn’t the people who voted for Trump over Killary. They damn sure didn’t get what they voted for, now did they?

The more things change…

UPDATE 2: With regards to that ridiculously scripted sounding transcript that Seymour Hersh says proves Syria didn’t use chemical weapons…

It occurs to me it came to Seymour via some unnamed intelligence agency source. Keep in mind, we already know Assad didn’t use chemical weapons. So what does the new story seem too say? It says the intel community told Trump Assad didn’t use chemical weapons and he attacked the airfield anyway. I sincerely doubt that. More likely, the chemical weapons fabrication was crafted by the intel community and they MISINFORMED Trump so that the attack would take place and now, in retrospect, in another attempt to undermine his presidency, they have fed this story to Seymour and he published it, saying it wasn’t the intel community’s fault, after all, they told Trump the truth.

However you look at it, I am not making as much of that story by Hersh as some of my more gullible colleagues out there are right now and that is why. If you read the transcript it seems like it was written by a publicist for the intel community rather than being an authentic exchange. In fact, it’s obviously scripted however you look at it, whomever you think did it.

17 Responses

  1. how can Every(wo)man cogitate such brilliant analysis…
    consistently…so early in the morning.?

    (my meager mind aches)

  2. Why the rush to destroy Syria? Because the jackals running the Central Banks fiat currency fraud are running on fumes. The EU is rushing in to bail out Italian banks, and the whole slimy mess is about to implode, so the neoCONs, Zionists and their Israeli Overlords know they need to finish off Syria before their world-wide Ponzi schemes come crashing down, making the Crash of 2008 seem like a picnic. Jared needs to be sent packing back to his slums where he can fuck with the tenants and not set off a world war.

    Video: Israeli Air Strikes in Support of Al Qaeda Forces in South Western Syria

  3. Is Brad Pitt developing a conscience?

  4. The empire might be losing more on the grand chessboard than just the Kurdistan lebensraum project. The old order seems to be rapidly collapsing from Qatar to Egypt to Turkey. I imagine there’s more than a few likudniks and Arabian aristocrats buying tickets for a one way flight to Argentina this summer.

    I’d guess the only reason we haven’t yet seen a full blown ground invasion of Syria is because Sec. of War Mad Dog is queuing up for a major regional war…1914-style imperial ‘maintenance’.

  5. Israeli PM Nutty and members of his administration are under several corruption probes, so a good fireworks show in Syria and Gaza, plus stealing some more of Syria would take some heat off his sorry ass.

  6. Hey Willy Loman: Happen to notice that Sy Mockingbird Hersh kicked off the narrative for the Trump administrations claim that Syria will have yet another chemical attack??

    Always doing his creative narration creation duty that Sy, guy!

  7. Willy “I am not making as much of that story by Hersh as some of my more gullible colleagues out there are right now and that is why”

    What a pleasant surprise to read all your updates.:)

    I wanted to puke reading all the platitudes and admiration for Hersh.
    For a guy who had to go to Germany for publishing, as if that matters these days, and how nice it was for the German publisher to have this all in english for us.

    I call him Sy Mockingbird Hersh. For very good reasons

  8. I like Sy Hersh. I do not think he deserves to be called a Mockingbird.

  9. This is the kind of article that drew me in a few years back, honest news and opinion. Your analysis is sadly shot over the heads of the general American population.

    Here’s an idea that, if true would make for a more positive outcome. I’ve suspected for years that Israel (the criminal gang) have been running huge sectors of America like an extortion racquet. Can they access all of our private communications, POTUS admin included? That, alone would make for complicated diplomacy.

    Could Trump simply be going along to get along? Does he know the troubles he’d incur were he to confront or displease Israel? I read some comments suggesting the US gave advance warning of the airport bombing. Loss of life minimized, but Israel pleased with overall actions. Do you think this might be what’s going on under the surface?

  10. When I first read the transcript I assumed Hersh was going to trash it as it sounds so completely forced. When I realized he was using it to support his “Trump is nuts” story line, I almost cried, yet another once respected man now with feet of clay and a mouth full of lies. Keep up the great work!!

    • do you have a link to that transcript? I read it the other day but it wasn’t included in his Welt article and I forgot where I saw it. I want to write more specifically about it today if I can. If you or anyone else knows where it is, please let me know. thanks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: