25 Media Outlets Suing for 911 Calls, Recording of FBI Negotiations and Police Body-cam Footage from Pulse Nightclub Shooting

by Scott Creighton

25 major media outlets including the Orlando Sentinel are suing the city of Orlando for the release of some vital information relating to the Pulse nightclub mass casualty event that happened a couple weeks ago.

Notably, they want the audio recording of the FBI negotiation with the shooter, the audio recording of the 911 call he made during the standoff in which the feds claim he proclaimed his “allegiance to ISIS” and any body-cam footage from responding officers involved in the initial attack and the final shootout some three hours later.

The city of Orlando is fighting the release of these details, which are often released to the public when requested, on the grounds that “the FBI has asked the city to withhold information.”

Clearly the interest is in making sure the voice of the shooter matches the one on record of Omar Mateen. They can compare his appearance on that documentary about the BP oil spill to any Pulse related audio file and determine pretty easily if those voices match.

By requesting police body-cam videos they also seem to want to make sure the police response didn’t add to the casualty list.

Perhaps not surprisingly, there is a precedent set in Orlando regarding keeping such information from the public. The night before the Pulse shooting, there was what appeared to be at least the beginning of another mass casualty event which took place at yet another nightclub. But that one was nipped in the bud by the brother of the target victim jumping on the shooter and taking him out in a fit of rage. Guess what Orlando says about releasing those files:

In another recent high-profile case, Orlando police withheld 911 calls in the shooting death case of singer Christina Grimmie due to the exemption over the depiction of a killing. Orlando Sentinel

Apparently there is some form of an exemption to full disclosure laws regarding the “depiction of a killing”

I’m not exactly sure what that means but it sounds an awful lot like some doesn’t want an event’s “depiction” altered in the public’s view.

I will try to keep up with the progress of this lawsuit.

4 Responses

  1. Two updates:
    The first is a auto-pat on the back by an OS writer for the great job they’ve been doing …
    The second is fluff from the authoritative NPR …

    There’s no way any of us are going to actually hear or see anything from this FF. Sue anybody you like … It just don’t work like that …

  2. This smacks of the ’28 pages’. They’ll release(‘create’) them if need be and as it suits the agenda.

    • Yep, the ’28 pages Gambit’ again. The Ministry of Truth probably calls it exactly that. A variation was used to validate the ‘LaVoy Fincum Killing’ psyop a few months back.

  3. Sounds like the Darrell Earnhart law has broad application.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: