Dutch MPs slam secrecy, question lack of evidence in MH17 investigation

from RT

Dutch lawmakers have questioned the course of the investigation into the MH17 crash in Ukraine, highlighting innuendos in the Dutch Safety Board report, and lack of raw data despite US claims of picking up “imagery” as the jet disappeared from radars.

Dutch MPs have held a parliamentary debate on the investigation into the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 in eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014 that killed all 298 on board, most of them citizens of the Netherlands.

In particular, the Tuesday discussion focused on the final report into the causes of the incident issued by the Dutch Safety Board last October, and the recent chief prosecutor’s letter which revealed the investigation has no raw radar data, useful footage or satellite images of the missile launch.

During the debate, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s government insisted that there was already enough information for a criminal investigation into the crash, while Dutch opposition lawmakers questioned innuendos and a lack of firm evidence.

Among the questions raised by Dutch MPs was an issue concerning raw radar data and satellite imagery that the United States claimed to have in its possession and which it called strong evidence.

“We picked up the imagery of this launch. We know the trajectory. We know where it came from. We know the timing, and it was exactly at the time that this aircraft disappeared from the radar,” said US State Secretary John Kerry in an interview with David Gregory of NBC’s Meet the Press in July 2014.

The reason why Dutch investigators apparently haven’t seen that data was questioned during the parliamentary debate: “So our question is, why has [it] not been asked what information they had because Kerry literally says: we saw it “disappear from the radar” screens,” said Pieter Omtzigt of the of the Christian Democratic Appeal.

The Dutch Minister of Security and Justice Ard van der Steur in response argued that the Safety Board on one hand “stated in their report that they themselves did not ask for this data” while on the other the investigators “were given insight into the information distributed to the by the Americans via the Military Intelligence Services.”

Meanwhile, Washington officials have failed to clarify to what extent alleged US intelligence was shared with the investigation.

“I believe we have collaborated with the Dutch in their investigation,” State Department spokesperson Mark Toner told RT’s Gayane Chichakyan. “I just don’t know to what level we shared information with them, I’d have to look into that.”

The evidence provided by Ukraine has also raised questions during the debate, in particular the lack of raw radar data, which was unavailable because the military radar was allegedly switched off and the primary civil radar was allegedly on maintenance, according to Kiev’s claims.

[read more here]

5 Responses

  1. Italy has plenty of evidence as well. The Italian electronic intelligence ship Elettra was parked off the coast of Crimea at the time off the shootdown. These ship suck up and record every electronic emission.
    The whole point of ‘investigations’ of MH17 is to conceal evidence and hide the names of the two guilty parties- Avigdor Lieberman and Idor Kolomoisky.

  2. Why doesn’t anyone seem to be linking the sudden wealth of the Malaysian Prime Minister with the silence of the MH17 investigation? Seems clear to me.


  3. It is impossible for heavy objects which actually fall from the sky to sit lightly upon the soft farmland. In other plane crashes the heavy pieces gouge the earth in long gullies to mark their path of approach– unless every one falls perpendicular to the land surface. In that case the pieces half bury themselves. A heavy engine falling from the sky fractures CONCRETE. Each and every piece of MH17 sits lightly and makes not even a dent in the farmland.

    This is what real aircrashes look like:

    The heavy parts were at the intersection of a paved road and a service road. The service road belonged to a chicken farm where there would be industrial refrigeration for the bodies which Strelkov claimed were not fresh. (He was recalled to Moscow.) The farm had numerous buildings in which to keep wreckage, also a RR spur and boxcar. It also had a truck with crane for moving heavy objects.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: