San Bernardino Shooting – Inconvenient Details Glossed Over by Corporate Press

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE:San Bernardino Shooting UPDATES: 2nd Witness “3 White Male Shooters”, Lawyer Baffled at Absurd Story

San Bernardino Shooting – When Propaganda Becomes a Media Three Ring Circus Freak Show


One way you can tell a mass casualty psyop event is when the MSM deliberately gloss over inconvenient details of the official story like they’re not even there. It’s kind of like when the 9/11 Commission Report made the statement that they didn’t really care who financed the operation because “ultimately it’s of little significance”

Keep moving folks. Nothing too see here.

In the case of the San Bernardino shooting spree, there are a lot of inconvenient details. Glaring inconvenient details which scream to be flushed out by the phony “journalists” making big bucks working for the usual suspects… but they wont be.

1. Who bought the rifles? – First and foremost of these is the fact that the two guns that did the most damage in the attack were not owned by or purchased by either of the two patsies suspects.

“Farook purchased the handguns in California, police said. Someone else bought the rifles. Local and federal authorities haven’t elaborated on the purchases.” a “reporter” for the Huffington Post

One would think that if the desired outcome would be to keep assault weapons out of the hands of the “wrong” people, it would be important for the media to figure out just how these weapons got in those dead hands. But of course, one would be wrong.

The article written by the “reporter” for the Huffington Post goes on and on about high capacity magazines and armor piercing .223 rounds used at the scene.  All of that is from those assault weapons. Which means the most crucial question to be asked might just be “who bought them the weapons and gave them to them?”

What reporters at the press conference got instead of answers to these important questions was the corporate run-around:

San Bernardino police didn’t immediately respond to request for comment on whether the attackers possessed the weapons legally in California. ATF declined to provide details about the weapons, referring inquiries to local police.” a “reporter” for the Huffington Post

It seems to me to be a rather important part of the story and for now all we are being told is the patsies suspects had these weapons and we don’t need to know the details about who owned them or how they ended up killing all these people.

2. Patsies Suspects Hid Their Crates of Bullets, Boxes of Bombs, Tactical Gear (and training?) and Killer Intentions from Family? – Like Adam Lanza and James Holmes before them, Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik seemed like peaceful, normal folks just trying to live their lives before they suddenly turned into psycho killers… for no apparent reason.

“At the Islamic Center of Riverside, where Farook had worshipped until about two years ago, mosque director Mustapha Kuko described him as quiet, private and devoted to Koran study.

He knows that we believe that to take one life is to take all life. So for him to do the opposite of what we as Muslims believe … I don’t know,” Kuko said.” some “reporters” from the LA Times

Over at the LA Times, a whole pile of “reporters” write about how the Muslim Bonnie and Clyde successfully “hid” all their weapons and bad intentions from family, co-workers and friends and never once do the “reporters” seem to come to the conclusion that maybe they “hid” all these things so well… because they never had them until after the Gladio-styled event.

That Farook’s own mother had apparently sensed nothing wrong underscored a feeling among investigators and acquaintances Thursday that the couple responsible for the massacre at a holiday party inside the Inland Regional Center scrupulously concealed their views, plans and a cache of weapons and explosives.” some “reporters” from the LA Times

Ah. See that? Since they obviously “hid” all of these things SOOOO successfully, that means they MUST have done it because it proves how “scrupulous” they are.

Talk about convoluted logic.

Not only did they hide their bad intent from family members, apparently they hid them pretty well from the FBI and the whole of Homeland Security as well.

“After a background check by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security, she was granted a conditional green card last summer.” some “reporters” from the LA Times

The couple seemed very well adjusted to life here in the states and it makes sense seeing as how he was born and raised here.

They did all the typical things like wedding celebrations, baby showers, attended religious meetings every week… they were the picture perfect young married couple just living their lives in sunny California.

“The couple held a walima, a celebration after the wedding, at the Islamic Center of Riverside for people who couldn’t attend the Saudi ceremony. Ali said a few hundred people attended. The couple’s daughter was born in the spring and co-workers at the San Bernardino County Public Health Department, where Farook worked for five years as an inspector, said some of them had thrown him a baby shower.

An online baby registry in Malik’s name listed a large box of Pampers, Johnson’s safety swabs, a car seat and baby wash.” some “reporters” from the LA Times

This guy was so Westernized, his brother served in the Navy in the “Global War on Terrorism”

Farook got a bachelor’s degree in environmental health from Cal State San Bernardino in 2010. His older brother, Syed Raheel, who also attended La Sierra, joined the Navy immediately after high school. He served from 2003 to 2007 and was awarded two medals for service in the “Global War on Terrorism.” some “reporters” from the LA Times

The fact that none of this appears to serve as a red-flag to those “reporters” at the LA Times is quite remarkable. As was the case with both Lanza and Holmes, this is not a profile of mass murderers we are seeing develop and these reporters don’t seem bothered by that obvious fact in the slightest.

True to form, the glaring contradiction, the one thing that makes absolutely no sense to anyone even a war-mongering congress-critter, holds no sway on their near-religious faith in the official stories they are being told:

The idea of a new mother helping carry out a mass murder perplexed many. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who had a classified FBI briefing on the shooting Thursday, said leaving an infant for a suicide mission was “not something a woman would easily do.”

“So it’s going to be very interesting for me to see what her background was, what level of animus she had, because she had to have a considerable level,” Feinstein said.” some “reporters” from the LA Times

“Perplexing”? Uh… I don’t think “perplexing” quite covers it.

We are expected to believe that this couple, with this background, left some party they attended with people who attended their wedding celebration and threw them a baby shower… went home, kissed their brand new baby one last time, got suited up with their hidden cashe of weapons and tactical gear, WITH MASKS MIND YOU, and returned to destroy them all and then go out in a hail of bullets?


Absolute, unadulterated, industrial strength bullshit.

The reason they choose people like this for events like these is BECAUSE they would be the LAST people you would expect.

Why is that important?

Because when they start rounding up folks, it will always be the peaceful ones, the neighborly ones, the ones you would never suspect of being aligned with “ISIS” or whatever the boogieman is called when it starts.

They aren’t going to round up Bubba down the street with “Go ‘MERIKA!” bumper stickers on his NASCAR special edition Ford F-150. Bubba is what they want him to be. One of those guys who would be sitting around planning the shooting of the president, if they allowed him, back in 1963 because the damn “sooOoooOooocialist” was giving into Castro and had to be killed in order to save “Merika!”

3. What About Those Three Tall Athletic White Guys the Witness Saw Shooting People? (H/T dougross) – CBS News did an interview with a witness, Sally Abdelmageed, via the phone right after the attack. What she described was:

“three men, dressed in all black, military attire with vests on holding assault rifles and one of them opened up the door to building three… and he… opens up the door to building three and … he… starts to spray, shoot all over into the room… I couldn’t see a face, he had a black hat on (mask) and uh, from my view all I could see was a black hat (mask) and long sleeve shirt… black cargo pants with zippers on the sides, big puffy pockets, he had a huge assault rifle and extra ammo… I just saw three dressed exactly the same…. their skin tone looked white. They looked like they were athletic build. They appeared to be tall” Sally Abdelmageed

If you go to the CBS “News” website to view the interview, you may be out of luck. The video doesn’t appear to be working anymore. What a shock.

However, I found it on Youtube. You might want to download a copy of it since it seems destined for the memory hole.

Some might try to claim the “fog of war” effected Sally’s memory of the events. But she seems very specific in her description of the events and her story matches the official version in many ways.

We know a third individual was arrested after “fleeing” the scene. And we also know initial reports told us it was three assailants who attacked the center.

Her description of the “very large rifle” also fits the narrative.

The official story says the assailants wore black tactical gear and masks, what she describes as “hats” that kept her from seeing their faces.

However, aside from the fact that we are told it was two shooters and not three, what also doesn’t fit is this:

That is reportedly the body of Tashfeen Malik after it was dragged from the vehicle post shoot-out.

Notice she is neither male, athletic nor tall. Compare her body to those men standing nearby. Compare the length of her arms.

She is slight of build and short. Compare her body to the tire on the SUV. Compare her foot to the handles on the doors. She almost child-like in stature.

She is in a word… tiny.

How would the “fog of war” transform two people into three?

How would the “fog of war” transform this hobbit into a “tall, athletic man”?

It could not and would not.

Fact is, were Malik to have been one of the shooters, her miniature stature would have stood out. It would have seemed odd and out of place, the kind of thing that your memory would certainly hold onto.

Expect her witness testimony to be dropped down the memory hole. Expect Sally’s credibility to be attacked in public if it isn’t allowed to be forgotten by those of us out here still trying to get to the truth.

4. Logistics? – So we know the assault rifles, very military looking by the way… did not belong to the patsies suspects… and no one seems to care.

We also know the house they fled to “may or may not” have been where either of them lived and “may” have simply been a staging house for their big attack.

We also know the black SUV with Utah plates was a rental.

The guns? Someone else’s.

The hideout? Someone else’s.

The vehicle? Someone else’s.

You think that might raise some flags of interest in the MSM? Everything associated with this event seems to belong to someone other than the patsies suspects?

5. What if?

What if (just saying now)… what if it was three guys shooting up that privatized business in California just like the witness said? They seemed to look military to her and it just so happens that the weapons used were military grade and don’t track back to the patsies suspects. After all, everyone admits they were wearing masks, right?

What if the shooters were able to escape the scene somehow (miraculously considering there was a drill taking place when this went down and the suspects were still able to leave without being chased by law enforcement) and went back to that house where they got out of the car, stuck a drugged up couple of patsies suspects in the car and made an anonymous call to authorities telling them where they could be found?

What if one of them, waiting for the cops to show up, drives by the police outside the residence and guns the engine in order to make sure the SUV registered to someone other than the patsies suspects was followed?

What if after arriving at the predetermined location (where the thousands of police cars are waiting) the driver of the SUV jumps out, raises his hands, and “flees the scene” being arrested by authorities, later to be released due to demands from higher up?

And what if the drugged patsies suspects stirring around in someone else’s car with someone else’s guns and dressed in someone else’s tactical gear get shot up in a hail of bullets just as soon as that third man is out of the way?

Seems to me that the “what if” scenario I just presented makes a lot more sense than the newly wed first-time parents and well adjusted couple deciding out of the blue to kill their long-time friends and co-workers because they were “radicalized” on the internet by having a few contacts with low-level FBI suspects.

(food for thought: did they contact the FBI low-level suspects (i.e. FBI informants) or did the FBI informants contact them and get told to get stuffed by the couple? Just some food for thought)

If you take the time to look at the inconvenient details of the case, a vastly different picture emerges, doesn’t it?

As a side note, take a look at this:

In Paris, we had reports of 3 tall athletic men dressed in military tactical gear, shooting up the streets and killing scores of people before somehow getting away from the scene in a black vehicle. Rented vehicle mind you.

Officials then killed a couple in a town house not that far away.

Radicalized people linked to “ISIS” was the story.

There had been a drill conducted that day.

In San Bernardino, we have a report of 3 tall athletic men dressed in military tactical gear, shooting up a building and killing scores of people somehow getting away from the scene in a black vehicle. Rented mind you.

Then officials kill a couple in the street not that far away.

The claim is that they were radicalized on the internet.

There was a drill taking place at the time of the event.

Is it just me, or does anyone else see a pattern?


Please help keep us up and running if you can.

Speaking truth ABOUT power since 2007

(For my mailing address, please email me at


116 Responses

  1. Scott,
    Thank you for all the work you do. Your synopsis speaks truth to The Powers That Be, and resonates with my observations of this black psyop. While being surrounded by friends and family who blindly swallow the MSM’s party line, I find comfort and gratitude in knowing there are others out there who can’t help but call bullshit on these Gladio operations.
    Sending you a contribution for the holidays to thank you for your efforts in making this blog possible, day in and day out. You produce great work.

    • thank you very much.

      • Nice work covering this event, Scott. You got over 1,000 Facebook shares on this article. Is that a record?

        • It’s close. I received a number of them on my record day a couple years ago when the website received 74,000 page views in one day. I was writing about the Cheonan, I think. Or it could have been the Boston Bombing. I’m not sure. But 1,000 shares is very large for an article on this website and I’m glad because there’s good info people need to see in the article and comment section.

          • Indeed. Someone’s gotta piece these PSYOPs together because God knows the corporate media isn’t going to do it. Keep it up!

            • Holy shit! Now it’s over 3,000 shares on Facebook. It appears WordPress is having issues showing how many shares on the other platforms.

              I’ll check out more of the comments. I’ll stick to the ones you reply to since there are so many. I’m assuming you reply to the ones with the most substance.

              • between the comments left here and the emails, its hard to keep up. plus I am still working on new articles. the response to this story has been remarkable. I’m very happy that people are seeing it, sharing it and it is sparking a discussion on this event and the others as of late.

                There are many comments of substance I simply don’t have the time to reply to. Many that simply don’t need any reply. the ones left by “bin Laden” are a good example. Yeah, it’s quite possible that these two patsies were FBI assets they cashed in though I hesitate to speculate as to their fate.

                • There’s another “active shooter” situation unfolding right now.


                  I see you have over 7,000 Facebook shares on this article now. Certainly that has to be a record, no? Either way, keep up the good work.

                  • I went back and took a look at the busiest day I ever had (79k page views) and the main article that brought them in was something I did on the Boston Bombing. Though that article was viewed 69k times that day alone, to this day, it only has 61 Facebook shares. Whats interesting here is that by contrast, this article, with it’s 7,000+ Facebook shares, has only been viewed a total of 71k times thus far over the course of the last 7 days. In the case of the previous article, search engines brought in the most traffic. Over the course of the first 7 days that article was up, it looks like it was viewed around 200,000 times. Again, with a total of 61 Facebook shares. So it is a record, yes, but I wonder if it means somehow my articles are being blocked by the search engines these days. I have very little traffic from them on this article.

                    • Well, Google was set to change their policy to vet articles for “accuracy”, and push down articles that challenge official narratives, so you could very well be correct.

                      Also, maybe the reason there are so many more shares this time around is because more people are awake. Perhaps the readers of the Boston Bombing articles dismissed it due to cognitive dissonance. Did you get more shills trying to combat your articles on that false flag than you are on this event? Let’s hope this new “active shooter” event isn’t another op.

  2. Scott,

    Good synopsis thus far. A few other things I found very out of place – unless you consider the alternative storyline you have outlined here – are:

    The pipe bombs, fire alarm and 4 hours of unaccounted for activity – IF they had pipe bombs, and were truly on this kind of mission – and looking at terror tactics; then how/why was the alarm activated? In many, many uses of terror the first responders are drawn into the scene and then secondary attacks are executed. Just conveniently leaving a “suspicious box” with a remote?? If their “operation” had been interrupted somehow, then leaving the box is plausible, I suppose…but they weren’t interrupted, so why were they not detonated, either at the scene or when the responders showed up? If they had the 4 hours of time, certainly they would have done so. Tactically, it makes no sense. Tactically, they should have led with the bombs (given the supposed preparation and remote) and then they could have done far more damage and still gotten away. The same idea behind a flash bang before entering a room LE/military use.

    Certainly a sensible person in the building could have activated the alarm – and I predict a witness is marched out in front of the cameras to claim they did it, but I have not heard of that report as of yet. It is my opinion that whoever pulled the alarm would have claimed that by now to get their 15 minutes, and it would have been reported ad nauseum.

    Furthermore, let’s not forget the guys from Sandy Hook that were detained and then disappeared/released/unaccounted for.

    Additionally, if they didn’t intend to suicide themselves, then why in the hell would they just putter around for 4 hours? THAT is ridiculous.

    I find it interesting that the narrative is now pointing at the wife having “radicalized” her husband…just as the announcement comes that the military is opening ALL elements to women. They’ll say, “See, our enemies women are in the fight, you should be too”.

    I’m not following this as close as you, so I may have missed some data regarding the above. Thanks for all you do.

  3. Also, I was reading some of the testimony from eyewitnesses in Aurora, and they used the exact same description of the shooter. Athletic.

    One of the witnesses stated that he was so surprised when he saw Holmes’ face because it didn’t match the eyes he saw through the mask, he couldn’t put the face with the eyes and that the body of person he saw was athletic and he thought of military personnel.

    Certainly not significant taken by itself, but it in the bigger picture, the pattern is reinforced.

  4. Excellent article. Solid analysis. My early intuition was that the two actually dead perpetrators were innocent individuals. And by innocent I mean completely and absolutely. Totally set-up and murdered.

    So the real ‘shooters’ were the 3 tacops guys. And, like so many recent events, I suspect all reported deaths are false.

    • there is an interesting video of the triage scene. I will post that next. very interesting.

      here is the link

      • I wonder if this isn’t footage taken at the drill that was carried out at a (campus?) library on Monday. Perhaps mistakenly or deliberately used as active shooter (WTHITA? Is there sometimes a passive shooter? Are you still an active shooter after you’ve knocked off and gone home?) aftermath footage. If not…

        With respect to the “jokers” (00:24), the woman on the right is holding the other woman’s head in the exact same way as the female Parisian bar-tender held the bulletproof woman’s head DIRECTLY after she got behind the bar. As you would, with a perfect stranger.

        Whether the footage is from Monday or Wednesday, this seems to be an official crisis actor pose. Two women, one shocked, the other calmly providing head-to-breast succour. Perhaps, we should start cataloguing them.

    • Yeah, I’ve seen interviews with the supposed “loved ones” of the “deceased” and they look fake as hell to my practiced eye. Here’s a sample:

  5. It’s an absolutely ridiculous scenario/narrative and only idiots would believe it for even a split second.

    • Right. Not for a split second. But if you give it slightly more time than less than a second (many cannot think for that long, I understand), nobody with half a brain could believe the patently impossible official story.

    • No offense speculator247, but we’re not going to wake people up by calling them ‘idiots’. There are plenty of decent, otherwise intelligent people who are still deeply asleep, deeply deceived. I use to be one of them. Anyone who regularly consumes MSM news, and trusts it, will be spellbound by it. Let us not forget that our education system trains people to believe authority, not question it. Trains people on what to think, not how to think critically.

      • I think what speculator247 was saying is that since they’re not idiots, they must be faking believing it for some personal (emotional) gain, in the way a wife might ‘believe’ her husband’s cock and bull stories about how the lipstick got on his collar.

        “…deeply asleep, deeply deceived… spellbound by it…” trained “what to think, not how to think critically.”

        You seem ready to relieve them of responsibility. I’m not. I think they CHOOSE not to see, or, better, they choose to pretend they can’t see.

        —Cypher: I don’t want to remember nothing. Nothing. You understand? [pause] And I want to be rich. You know, someone important, like an actor.

        Sound familiar?

  6. Thanks for your excellent analysis!

  7. Excellent analysis!

  8. Excellent Scott,
    I’m a Marine Vietnam grunt
    veteran. What was it Gil Scott Heron
    sang? “It follows a pattern if you know what I mean.”

    Hitler once said that “terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives a people harder than the fear of instant death.” I’m not 100% sure of the exact wording.

    The real terrorist’s masterminds are in Langley. Virginia, the Pentagon. White House
    and the Supreme Court and many other places.

    “War is a Racket…and lying propaganda is” “necessary to bring men to the pitch were they kill each other, and women give up their men and boys to be killed.” Major General Smedley D. Butler

  9. Also find it odd that nobody seems to care that he was a government employee. Government employee goes on shooting spree with government looking weapons/armor then killed in an government looking black suv. Umm ok yea we get it. Funny how the government is now wearing ski masks, dressed in black or camo full body armor in these events seen on tv. It is the same description used for the shooters or the terrorist.

  10. designed and engineered that way…

  11. Wow Scott, another excellent piece, if you are not careful you could be branded as “radicalised”.. our borough of camden here in london defines radicalised as one who does not agree with the MSM news.

  12. Reblogged this on Joseph Davis and commented:
    “We are expected to believe that this couple, with this background, left some party they attended with people who attended their wedding celebration and threw them a baby shower… went home, kissed their brand new baby one last time, got suited up with their hidden cashe of weapons and tactical gear, WITH MASKS MIND YOU, and returned to destroy them all and then go out in a hail of bullets?


    Absolute, unadulterated, industrial strength bullshit.”

    • I know that between all of the Scott-like journalists and citizen-journalists, there is already so much evidence to prove many of these psyops are bullcrap… But, I could say that this little video might be one of the most damning proofs that ALL of the mass casualty shootings are staged or fake or hoaxes…

      What in the fuckin’ world is this charade? Are they getting so desparate that they don’t even try to make the narratives even remotely believable..???


      (thx for posting +canadaslava)

    • Same subject matter C(IA)NN’s Anderson Cooper is your ringmaster for todays circus.

    • This conclusively proves the whole story is as fake as fake can be. The likelihood that the police or FBI would ever allow a shooter suspect’s apartment, cram-packed with randomly strewn-about and not collected and tagged and bagged evidence, to be compromised by outsiders is ZERO. It Could never happen. The fact that it did means with 100% certainty that the whole story is phony. An astonishing error by the planners. But I momentarily forgot, part of the plan always seems to be to test how preposterous a story they can put out and still have the public buy it. This is one of the boldest such tests yet.

  13. “Female San Bernardino attacker Tashfeen Malik pledged her allegiance to Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdad on Facebook as she carried out a deadly shooting spree with her husband, according to CNN.” –WashingtonTimes


  14. Sitting here waiting for this radicalized couple’s “manifesto” to suddenly be “found” … It’s about due, isn’t it.

    • !!!BREAKING NEWS!!!

      San Bernardino ISIS, IS, IL, Daesh (just pick whichever name you like) couple’s radicalization source has been found!!

      It turns out the couple’s seemingly innocent 6 month old baby wasn’t so innocent after all. Sources have confirmed that for the past 4 weeks the baby had been visiting extremist pro-ISIS websites using the couple’s smartphones. Leaving website pages open for mom and dad to discover. These brief exposures were enough to drive the couple into ultrasupermax (new catchword) radicalized terrorists…. in just weeks! Exactly how the infant was able to do this, is as of now, a mystery… There is also evidence of visits to other potentially subversive sites including; Babies’R’us, buybuyBaby, and

      Terrorist experts say this is a terrifying discovery as it indicates that new terrorist could be created in mere hours instead of the normal months/years. And now every toddler is a potential terrorist… or todderrist.

      “This changes everything….” – unnamed terror expert

      If they thought enough people would buy this they would run it… the more disturbing thought is how many people would buy it today.

      You’ve got to laugh about this shit from time to time, it beats crying.

      • Why do you think the Planned Parenthood attacks happened? The gunman was obviously put up to it by Baba al-Hoyman, in order to prevent the water torture and eventual death of some potential new recruits.

        Spanish for ‘Brotherhood’? Hermandad. It all fits!

        (This information was provided by a source who wished to remain anonymous due to the fact that he hadn’t been Christened yet.)

  15. FWIW They are saying the 2 rifles were a private party sale which followed CA “Universal Bsackground Check” requirements.

    A law enforcement source told CBS News senior investigative producer Pat Milton the weapons were purchased legally in California. The long guns were legally transferred from a friend.
    Meredith Davis of the ATF said all four guns were bought four years ago. Davis said California requires paperwork when guns change hands privately but many other states don’t.

    Have also seen conflicting stories about their wedding. They either got married in Saudi or CA.

    Am also still searching for more info on the 3rd suspect that was allegedly arrested and no longer mentioned in reporting…like guy in woods at Sandy Hook? It was unclear to me if he was in SUV, but it sort of makes sense since the wife was apparently seated in back.

  16. Attorney says couple found “handcuffed lying face down” in vehicle.35 sec mark

  17. Thanks for the work, Scott. It helps to have an antidote to the BS available. Extremely readable as usual.

    Couple of points.

    1. Why are they bringing a woman patsy into each of these FFs now? I keep getting flashes of Fun With Dick and Jane. Funny how, even if it’s a woman, the “shooter” has three names.

    2. If the couple were so scrupulous in hiding their Jeckyll-selves from everyone, who provided the cops with a “tip off” that led them to the house? Not an eye-witness 911 report of seeing three people in fatigues, armed with rifles going in the house, specifically a “tip off”.

  18. Another important note is during the early live helicopter broadcasts of the building, the reporters noted again and again that the police had told them NOT to show the building… only the group of people on a golf course who were (supposedly) led away from he building. There was no footage at all of people leaving the building. And later, the footage from the helicopter showed police surrounding a black sedan — before they went to the SUV — and a grey pickup truck drove right through the middle of the cop cars, took a left and drove away with no action from the police. Even the newscaster commented as to how odd it was that nobody seemed to notice.

  19. Initial reports and witnesses say automatic weapons fire. The couple had semiauto weapons “found” on them. I also read yesterday that the BATF stated that one off the weapons was originally purchased by the police dept. A good bad cop knows you don’t plant department owned weapons on your patsy.

  20. I came across this video of another witness who said he saw 3 men leave the building after the shoot out

    • Again, just sad that people become fair game to be labelled killers and terrorists, etc., simply because they’ve been killed by the police (when they wouldn’t if they were still alive). All such statuses would have to be decided by an independent public inquiry, in a real democratic state.

      We’re gearing up for a time when the police and media decide your guilt (dead or alive – what chance did Dzhojar Tsarnaev have of receiving a fair trial?)… if we’re not already there.

  21. This is just a hypothesis,suppose Farooq showed interest days earlier in the training exercises and was approached by some of the actors,they told him he could participate in a real live exercise the next day? Hey we can come to your house and show you how to act and be a part of a really fun game and as a bonus you and your wife will be paid.Seems legit and hey some of these guys are real cops and do this on the side to make extra cash.Just fill out these background checks and we can get you started right away….. Now truth seems stranger than fiction…a few radicals in law enforcement want a little revenge on the terrorist Muslim community…I don’t know? The camps are pretty divided here right? People are scared! The terrorists are everywhere! Last month we in facebookland hated the cops! Now they are here to save us from the Muslim terrorist invasion of refugee radicals entering our shores.And in Paris terrorists kill people but in the good ole US of A. Guns Kill People.I ask why aren’t people changing their profile pictures to the American flag? Your not French? But you changed your picture last month? Not a single word about this on my Facebook page! Are none of my friends true Americans? I don’t understand? We’re not enough people killed? It has to be over a hundred to make the grade? No kids or handicapped people were killed only specific employees of the health department? Pretty good shooting for terrorist haters with little or no training! I’m not really into conspiracy just want the facts! Eyewitness testimony is damning ! The cops themselves base all of their cases on it! And let’s face it ,it’s really hard to get a hundred people to agree on anything.Where is the third shooter? The guns found were not fully automatic ,in fact one of them was found to be unsuccessfully converted. Automatic fire was heard? Amatures were killed by the police after a professional hit by three muscular tall commandos! Pay attention sheeple ! The wolf is at the door! But which one is he?

    • And how many changed their picture to the Russian flag? How many Ya Ruskaya T-shirts did you see?

      It seems that France is held to be particularly special when it comes to WoT “campaigns”, positive or negative – Je suis Charlie, Je suis Paris, Freedom Fries, etc.

      And have you heard WORD ONE of sympathy for anyone who was killed or injured in the Mali “attack” (for me, they’re all FF until proved otherwise).

  22. Seems that way… But cmon… Sally ABDELMAGEED? You do realize Muslims are “allowed” to lie when it benefits Islam. You are going to take a Muslims eyewitness word that it was white men? Of course, it was white Christian terrorism!

    • So….Sally is their bro? She was being shot at with fully automatic weapons and would lie to the FBI to protect their identities? I don’t know dude? I don’t like being shot at! Bros of mine or not! They didn’t even have the courtesy to tell her beforehand? Hey yo look Sally,or a little sticky memo…yeh a little yellow sticky memo on her desk like…yo Sallly,don’t show up at the Christmas party! You might get hit by stray rounds!

    • And the FBI, being in a position to know that these two were actually the culprits (because, as they tell us, they saw the Facebook post and were shot at by them, etc.) haven’t seen fit to haul Sally in for questioning for obviously fabricating her story? I wonder why not?

  23. Farook and his wife were actually low-level FBI informants they were patriots working part time for the FBI this is why he spent so much time at his local mosque and his brother was in the US Navy so on Wednesday at the party he got a text message telling him to come right away to meet his handler. He and his wife left the party and they were murdered inside the regional center in an elevator or in the parking garage. Their bodies were put in the back of the SUV and 20 minutes later the three men in black show up to shoot the place up.

    The news media is told it was them and they believe it they took the story and ran with what they were fed. This was a classic false-flag perfectly scripted but it was sloppy. Every single “terror attack” involving the FBI has been a set-up by the FBI using Muslim Americans as patsies. Starting in 1993 with the WTC bombing. The NY Times did an article a couple years ago and every FBI “terror bust” was due to the FBI setting up patsies who they could then sting.

    The nearby active shooter drill was used the way all the adjacent simultaneous drills have been used. This is open and shut it’s easy to solve when you realize Farook and his wife were trusting of the FBI they were being paid to inform on other Muslims at their local mosque. Ironic that they were patriots only to be used and disposed of and now smeared for all eternity after their deaths. I know this is how it happened it’s obvious.

  24. man… the witness said 3 tall dudes … and somehow her account get lost in the shuffles… this is surreal!!!! Never thought i say this.. but yeh.. it look like these two were patsied!!!!

  25. I finally found one witness testimony: “2 men dressed in black”

  26. […] now the story is, while the miniature little woman, described by a witness as a “tall athletic white man“, was running around shooting up the place in San Bernardino, she was also busy contacting […]

  27. […] San Bernardino Shooting – Inconvenient Details Glossed Over by Corporate Press […]

  28. Thanks a lot. Let me just say it is heartening to stumble upon your efforts, when the entire Muslims community is swallowing the narrative. They’re so busy rotting with Guilt and apologizing – no one will question White corporate media (Al Jazeera, they’re happy to trash). I salute the spirit in which it’s done and the invaluable service rendered to your country. Whatever is the truth, inconvenient or costly for whoever, let it emerge.
    P.S. I vote for inclusion of the ‘tactical’ absurdity argument from Jedbo in the body of the post. Or as an addendum. This could be one of those ‘living posts’.

  29. After watching nearly all of James Holmes’ trial, he most definitely didn’t come across as: “peaceful, normal folks just trying to live their lives before they suddenly turned into psycho killers… for no apparent reason”. Many witnesses (including his own girlfriend and family) attested to how deeply and darkly disturbed he was…

    • Hang on, we’re to believe the purported girlfriend of a deeply and darkly disturbed man? What’s her excuse?

      • You’re so right! Don’t have the girlfriend testify. I’m sure she knows nothing of her own boyfriend’s behavior and thoughts.

        • Here’s my theory. YOU made the “deeply and darkly disturbed” thing up, because it’s nowhere to be found online (except in reference to your post here). This is the actual testimony…

          —Gargi Datta met Holmes at graduate school outside Denver and they went to a horror film festival on their first date in September 2011, she told the court on Wednesday.
          But she dumped him in February 2012 as she felt he was too intense.
          ‘I told him I saw no future for us, I think he liked me more than I liked him,’ Datta told the murder trial, adding: ‘He never had highs and lows of emotion.’
          Five months later, he opened fire on a midnight screening of The Dark Knight in a Colorado movie theater, killing 12 people and injuring 70.

          Too intense… for her. That is, he liked her more than she liked him. Never had high and lows of emotion.

          I’m going to assume you did that deliberately. I expect you have some reason for lying in a post on this site.

  30. Idk what to say except whoever writes all these things weren’t here in SB watching it live on TV and listening to police scanners. It does seem like bullshit but the guy got out and ran and the bitch was shooting at our police there are several witnesses and recordings so please stop trying to pass our loss off as “planned gov’t conspiracy” it’s fkn San Bernardino what is significant about people dying here!? People have been dying out here forever and I have lived here my entire life and graduated from the same college the so called terrorist did my family and friends are here we all experienced this but personally I wanted to believe it was conspiracy of some sort but it’s truly not. These IsIs followers have a belief and once it’s in their heads there is no stopping them that’s the point for them to blend and we been hearing this nonsense since 9/11 whether it was two or three or twenty the fact is there is evidence of the attack being terrorist related but for it to actually be the military or some form of it is absurd… If you are not in it don’t talk about it period.

    • Carla, I want you to take a deep breath, think carefully, then tell us: Did you “live on TV” SEE “the guy got out and ran and the bitch was shooting at our police”? Or did you make that up? Isn’t it true that you just heard that on the news?

      Did YOU even listen to police scanner live? If so, were the people talking on it involved in shooting incident or a drill for a shooting incident?

      Or are you just repeating what you heard on the news later?

      Do you think the fact that you were watching those later news reports in San Bernardino is material?

      Did you and you’re friends and family in San Bernardino actually “experience” anything associated with this event? Do you actually believe you are any more “in it” than, say, someone who lives in New Zealand? Is it not true that you’re just scared?

      “These IsIs followers have a belief and once it’s in their heads there is no stopping them…”

      Thank you, Carla, you’re excused jury duty.

  31. My friends and family think I’m crazy to think that this was a false flag operation. My mother said she’s worried about me! Of course I expected that. Then when they recount the “evidence” they heard or read, I respond, “SHOW ME THE PROOF!” But of course there IS NO PROOF that proves this innocent couple (impo) did this — no facebook posts showing allegiance to isis, no photos, no videos, no witness testimony! The witness testimony says 3 white men!

    • Its hard to believe that people can be so cruel, especially people we are supposed to respect and trust, like police chiefs, the FBI, various government officials and even the talking heads on the media who would never lie to us. I find it easier to talk with folks about these things, get them thinking and researching on their own, when I point out that it might not be as diabolical as you would think at first. Imagine if they are all staged, at least most of them. Try to look at it as a planner pitching the idea to a chief of police somewhere. The greater good they pursue is the confiscation of weapons from certain people they deem dangerous to society and keeping certain weapons off the streets. What good could a police chief see in that? Sure it’s deception, but everything is deception these days. Ads, news, politics… it’s all deception, but done, as you would tell him, for the betterment of our society, which, is currently spiraling out of control. So, convert a drill into a live production, no one gets hurt and in the end, after telling a few tall tales to the media folks, who already know what’s going on and are playing along with you, the political will of the country is moved closer to a safer place for the citizens and for law enforcement. Think of it as a morality play, not a lie or a false flag. Of course might require more convincing. Some might require outright threats. In the end, they see the greater good and go along with it. They are forced to sign a strict non-disclosure agreement and it’s a done deal. It really isn’t that hard to understand and it’s not some kind of personification of evil, at least, not on their parts. Cops have careers to protect and families to provide for. Same with doctors and MEs. The actors they bring in are certainly forced to sign non-disclosure agreements and probably paid pretty well considering… it’s an approach to helping them understand what is going on around them and maybe it’s rational enough to get them to start to look at the evidence that’s out there that you have found so they can come to their own understanding of it. But these people aren’t monsters and in some cases, I believe, some of them, just some mind you, think they are helping for the right reasons and that little bit of truth regarding the people we are supposed to respect, might just be that spoonful of sugar your friends and family need.

      • Intersting advice if it’s a hoax, but this was a false flag with actual people killed. It’s hard to see any good intentions in that.

        Have you seen this article saying that authorities were looking at Farook a week before the shooting? It’s from The Weekly Standard of all places. Naturally, they frame it as “a missed warning”, but they provide a few tapes of police chatter. Check it out if you haven’t already.

      • It’s now being claimed Farook deposited $28,000 into his bank account two weeks before the shooting. Payment as an informant perhaps?

        • A lie? Or are we to suppose that Farook knew how to hide a serious weapons and ammunition cache, etc., from everyone he knew, but could think of no alternative for keeping his mystery $28,000 safe but to deposit it into his bank account in full view of the IRS? How was he going to explain it?

          It really doesn’t take much THOUGHT to debunk most “smoking gun” facets of false flags.

          “Your bank business is not always your own business: the IRS might be in on the transaction as well. In an effort to keep tabs on money gained from illegal activities, the agency requires the reporting of certain deposits and, of course, there’s a form and procedures for that. Banks aren’t the only ones reporting large deposits; the IRS rules apply to any transaction carried out by a business or an individual.

          Cash and Form 8300
          When you deposit $10,000 or more in cash at the bank, the IRS requires the bank to complete a Form 8300. This form is for reporting any transaction or series of related transactions in which the total sum is $10,000 or more; a pair of $5,000 deposits, for example, will also wind up on Form 8300.

          Currency Transaction Reports
          By the Bank Secrecy Act, federal law also requires a Currency Transaction Report for any cash transaction of more than $10,000. The CTR is filed with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, a division of the Treasury Department that freely shares this information with the IRS. The purpose of this law is to track cash being “laundered” through the banking system in order to evade taxation or the investigation of criminal activity.”

          So, where’s the Form 8300 (he withdrew $25,000 in cash over a period of less than two weeks) and/or Currency Transaction Report, and what does it list as the source of the funds?

          From your link: “A spokesman for Union Bank, David Weidman, declined to comment on specific questions, including whether the Nov. 20 $10,000 cash withdrawal triggered reporting requirements. Weidman confirmed they are working with the FBI and others, adding, “We are cooperating to the full extent of the law with the agencies conducting investigations into this tragedy.””

          Now, isn’t that special. Why wouldn’t the answer be “Of course, it triggered reporting requirements. It does so automatically. It’s not something we leave up to bank tellers to do manually.”

          • They either made it up the whole story of the deposit to frame him or he was paid to take part in a drill and it went live. Perhaps he was an informant setting someone else up and he was double-crossed and killed. All I know for sure is that the official story isn’t adding up.

            • That sum was supposedly a loan from a peer-to-peer lender, Prosper.
              Some observations; these loans are usually granted to consolidate credit card debts at lower interest or for home improvements and the like. In any case, they are motivated by specific personal needs other than creating an assault arsenal.
              The process requires vetting of the loan candidate that runs standard checks on problems like links to terrorist organizations or other criminal networks.
              The banksters are none too keen on peer-to-peer lending for obvious $$$ reasons and it’s getting bigger all the time. Why not throw this alternative form of banking into the mix as a bonus in your FF?

  32. Anything is possible.

  33. […] not’ve been hers. Or maybe, through his reportage, he’d be able to answer all of the oddities Scott Creighton points out in this excellent blog post. Oh, and this former instructor of mine also wrote a great about the Umpqua “shooting,” […]

  34. […] San Bernardino Shooting – Inconvenient Details Glossed Over by Corporate Press […]

  35. SINCE WHEN has it taken longer than 24 hours to show security camera footage from a crime like this?

  36. And I quote:

    “According to an amendment to the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the House Bill H.R 5736 (now law), the federal government of the United States can now legally propagandize the domestic public.

    Arguably, this makes staged theatrical presentations, featuring crisis-actors, and purporting to be “reality”, legal.

    Consequently, not only are we contending with false media source information, corporate media gatekeepers, and commentators with largely undisclosed conflicts of interest, but now we must also contend with fabricated dramas orchestrated to invoke primordial fears and unthinking reactions in mass populations. It’s a closed loop circuit of lies, deceptions, and behaviour modification writ large. Recent evidence demonstrates, moreover, that the matrix of deceptions works brilliantly to engineer consent for the most heinous crimes imaginable.”


  37. Quran (2:191-193) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing…
    but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)”

    Quran (8:39) – “And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah

    Quran (9:5) – “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.”

    Quran (9:30) – “And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away

    Quran (17:16) – “And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction

    Quran (25:52) – “Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness

    Quran (33:60-62) – “If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter

    Wake up people, do your own research and learn for yourself, not what other people tell you. These are just a select few of verses straight from the Quran, that teaches war, violence, and hatred for all things non-Muslim. I’m still looking for the verse that states “to take a life is to take all life”. These are not just a few radicals this is exactly what the Quran teaches, what all Muslims live by. If they say they don’t and that they are peaceful then they are not Muslim. History is the greatest teacher, and yes history does show that even Christians during the crusades were violent, the bible does not teach Christians to kill all those that don’t believe, it does teach to give testimony and to try and teach the word of its God to those that don’t believe but, there is no passage that says to kill. The same goes for the Jews that only go by the Old Testament, again nowhere does it say to kill. Want to change my mind then show me one shred of proof that the Muslim religion teaches peace. With that I leave you with one last verse from the “peaceful” Quran.

    Quran (47:35) – “Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: “have the upper hand”) for Allah is with you,”

    • It would be a waste of time to try to explain to you how your perception of the religion of Islam is skewed. You seem quite comfortable in your hate. You wont find that here though and you wont convince others to follow you down that dark hole you have chosen for yourself. you would be better off over at Prison Planet chatting with Paul Joseph Watson.

      There are over a billion Muslims on the planet today. Were your assessment of their religion to be accurate, there would be millions of attacks on non-believers every day, but as you can see, there are not.

      And here is the kicker… were Islam to teach what you think it teaches, then various individuals and groups wouldn’t have to stage FAKE MUSLIM TERRORIST ATTACKS… now would they?

      Of course, to be able to see what I am talking about, you would have to get past your comfortable little hate cloud and you simply can’t do that, can you?

      No, 9/11 wasn’t “the Muslims” nor was 7/7, the Paris Attacks, Charlie Hebdo or San Bernardino.

      But somebody certainly wants you to hate Muslims. I wonder if that somebody might just happen to work on making fake beheading videos?

      Makes you think, doesn’t it?

      • No, the only thing I think is that if y’all spent half as much time actually researching instead of coming up with contrived conspiracy theories you might actually learn something. There are attacks worldwide daily by the peaceful Muslims, persecution, genocide, violence, all out war. It has been going on for centuries in the Middle East. But you prefer to live in your safe bubble, waiting on the world to spoon feed you because you feel entitled somehow. Yet, those of us in the real world actually pay attention to what is going on in the world, instead of playing make believe and trying to make a theory that has more holes than Swiss cheese try to sound credible. I presented to you verses from the Quran word for word, you know that book that the Muslim religion is centered on as prescribed by the prophet Muhammad. Yet, somehow my ideals are skewed, the verses are not open to interpretation, they are straight forward. But if you want to remain in that safe bubble of yours and think you understand it better than by all means head on over to Syria and ask them to clarify. So now please continue to insult, call me names and think you have any idea about what I hate or don’t hate, because you sir, will mostly likely be wrong. Good day sir!!!

        • lol… “I said GOOD DAY SIR!!!” lol…

        • I’m assuming that you are coming at the Quran from a Christian perspective. The irony is that an equivalent litany of divine inspired barbarism can be quoted straight from the Bible, that taken together teach war, violence, and hatred for all things non-Christian. The imagery of intolerance is exactly the same (and therein lies a clue as to the manner in which religion can be instrumentalized to the purposes of political and economic elites). Yet ordinary people who see themselves as nominally either Christians or Muslims, the overwhelming majority of them, are well beyond these sectarian tribal outlooks. They just want to live their lives unmolested and with a modicum of dignity. Unfortunately, they are all vulnerable to being incited by propaganda and made to believe by staged acts of terror that a designated enemy represents an existential threat to them.

          The Middle East is in chaos because the Western oligarchichal mafias are tearing it apart. And these criminals want you to go along with and help them achieve their criminal subjugation of resource rich lands and peoples. Apparently, they are succeeding in their aim.

          • You should check this out – it makes your point quite well!

            • Beautifully done.

              It also underscores perfectly the point that the majority of ordinary people are not fundamentalists even as they self-identify as being adherents of this or that religion or sect, that at bottom the vast majority are empathetic human beings who recoil at real or imagined acts of inhuman barbarity.

              Most people can only be compelled to go to war either by being outraged by injuries inflicted on people they perceive to be defenseless victims or out of fear for their own collective safety. I think that this is a basic moral standpoint common to the vast majority of people living on this earth, although it leaves us all vulnerable to military psy-ops. For group perceptions of who is being unjustly persecuted or threatened are, well, just that, perceptions, whether grounded in fact or fiction, and perceptions can be and are easily managed from the pulpit, so to speak.

              The real monsters and nihilists are among the ruling elites who, being in command of a multitude of well indoctrinated and economically dependent bureaucratic minions, engineer the conditions that render the masses hysterical, ready and willing to kill and die for what they believe to be the highest and most noble of causes — that is, until they reach the front lines, where circumstances end up making monsters of us all.

            • beautiful. thank you.

    • Matthew 10:34: Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.

      Luke 22:36,38: But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.

      Numbers 14:12: I will strike them with the pestilence and disinherit them, and I will make of you a nation greater and mightier than they.

      1 Samuel 15:3: Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.

      But, this is a little boring. Major organized religions exist to control people, and often to compete with “enemies”. If you look far enough, there will generally be violence. Even Buddhism (warrior monks?).

    • Bible (Ezekial 9:6) – “Kill them all—old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark.”

      Bible (Psalm 139:19-22) – Surely thou wilt slay the wicked, O God: depart from me therefore, ye bloody men. For they speak against thee wickedly, and thine enemies take thy name in vain. Do not I hate them, O Lord, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee? I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies.

      Bible (Leviticus 24:15-16) – “Anyone who curses their God will be held responsible; anyone who blasphemes the name of the Lord is to be put to death. The entire assembly must stone them. Whether foreigner or native-born, when they blaspheme the Name they are to be put to death.”

      Bible (Deuteronomy 13:12-15) – “If thou shalt hear in one of thy cities, which the LORD thy God has given thee to dwell there, that it is said, certain men, the sons of Belial, are gone out from among you and have incited the inhabitants of their city, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which ye have not known, then shalt thou enquire and search and ask diligently; and, behold, if it is the truth and the thing certain that such abomination is wrought among you, thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly with all that is therein and the beasts thereof, with the edge of the sword.”

      Wake up people, do your own research and learn for yourself, not what other people tell you. These are just a select few of verses straight from the Bible, that teaches war, violence, and hatred for all things non-Judeo-Christian. These are not just a few radicals this is exactly what the Bible teaches, what all Jews and Christians live by. If they say they don’t and that they are peaceful then they are not Jews/Christians.

      “the bible does not teach Christians to kill all those that don’t believe”

      YES, it does.

      “but, there is no passage that says to kill.”

      YES, there is.

      “The same goes for the Jews that only go by the Old Testament, again nowhere does it say to kill.”

      Then what are all those Bible quotes doing there above?

      “Want to change my mind then show me one shred of proof that the Muslim religion teaches peace.”

      The Judeo-Christian religions don’t teach peace either. The point of religions is to make people suffer.

      With that I leave you with one last verse from the “peaceful” New Testament.

      Jesus: “Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn [and here he quotes from Micah 7:6, in the Old Testament, which was unalterable LAW according to Jesus – ALL OF IT*]

      “‘a man against his father,
      a daughter against her mother,
      a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law—
      a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’” – Matthew 10:34-36

      *Jesus: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.” – Matthew 5: 17-18

      The “Law and the prophets” being the Old Testament.

      You were saying, Concerned Citizen?

      • Here’s another one.

        “The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness. For he is truly his brother’s keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you.” – Ezekiel 25:17.

        A lo, when the people heard this, it meant their ass.

      • That was way better than my little list – Thanks!

        • Your list gets an up-vote, too. My “Nice!” was inclusive if appended to Eggman’s trenchant reply.

        • (Ko-Ko:)
          As some day it may happen that a victim must be found,
          I’ve got a little list — I’ve got a little list
          Of society offenders who might well be underground,
          And who never would be missed — who never would be missed!
          There’s the pestilential nuisances who write for autographs —
          All people who have flabby hands and irritating laughs —
          All children who are up in dates, and floor you with ’em flat —
          All persons who in shaking hands, shake hands with you like that —
          And all third persons who on spoiling tête-á-têtes insist —
          They’d none of ’em be missed — they’d none of ’em be missed!

          He’s got ’em on the list — he’s got ’em on the list;
          And they’ll none of ’em be missed — they’ll none of ’em be missed.

          Gilbert and Sullivan, The Mikado

          • Just to be clear, that last Ezekial is fake and is spoken by Jules the hitman, in Pulp Fiction. Of course, 8 out of 10 Christians couldn’t tell the difference.

    • “Want to change my mind then show me one shred of proof that the Muslim religion teaches peace.”

      You see, the thing about the Quran is that, just as with the Bible, you can mine it for quotes. Depending upon your selection, you can pretty well make it say what you want it to.

      But to offer just one tiny little itsy bitsy shred of proof that the Muslin religion also, among other things, teaches peace:

  38. What LizH said…and also, Arrogant Ingnorance is the worst epidemic….there is no cure. Thanks for for providing at least an alternative antidote for those who suffer unknowingly, and for those of us who call BS but can do no more than that by raising valid questions, producing logical theories, and showing practical evidence.

    May God bless you and your work.

  39. […] Source: San Bernardino Shooting – Inconvenient Details Glossed Over by Corporate Press […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: