Kiev fights in Ukraine’s southeast for shale gas deposits to be controlled by US – Pushkov


The control over Ukraine’s southeast is important for Kiev first of all because of the shale gas deposits, which Western countries should be developing, head of the State Duma’s international affairs committee Aleksey Pushkov said on Saturday.

“Kiev is fighting in Ukraine’s east for the gas reserves: Germany says the reserves make 5,578 billion cubic metres (bcm) [the U.S. reserves are 8,976 bcm]. Control will be from the U.S.,” he wrote on Twitter.

The Yuzivska shale gas field is at the border between the Kharkov and Donetsk regions. The resources are estimated at over four trillion cubic metres. In May 2012, British-Netherlands Shell won the competition for development. Another company, certified for development of deposits in the Dnepropetrovsk-Donetsk area is Ukraine’s Burisma, where recently son of the U.S. Vice President Joe Biden became a member of the board of directors.

Residents of Slavyansk, which is the centre of the Yuzivska deposit, within several past year organised protests against development of the deposit. They even planned to organise a referendum on the issue.

Ecologists are concerned about consequences from hydrofracturing used in production of shale gas. They say the chemicals used are highly poisonous and may affect not only water, but also the air. Experts say utilisation of poisonous substances is still an overdue issue worldwide. The media report many countries have refused from developing deposits of the kind in their own territories – the Czech Republic, the Netherlands, and France.

3 Responses

  1. Found this interesting article about shale gas and oil. Seems we are being lead to believe some bogus information.

  2. Didn’t know where to post this,very smart guy.Thanks for your concern Scott,yes all quiet here in O’Fallon.

    • Stan, Sounds like WWIII is closer than we thought….
      he is a very smart man… hope they can help Europe to understand before it is too late.

      dishman, if fracking is so expensive, why do they keep doing it? I found that confusing….. strange that a corporation will refuse to cut cost on a loser. Wonder if maybe the destructive nature of fracking is being used for another reason?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: