Latest Wikileaks Psyop Maneuver: Providing Israel With Another Useful Existential Threat

by Scott Creighton

UPDATE: A new fake Israeli Wikileak cable exonerates Israel, condemns North Korea (see end of original article)

UPDATE 2: From ridiculous to the sublime – Bradley wants you to wish the troops and his “torturers” a Merry Christmas


Julian Assange has stated on al Jazeera that he will release some 3,700 secret (and even “top-secret”) documents pertaining to Israel in 6 months.

Why would he wait if he had “truth” that needed to be revealed to the world?

What he is doing is providing an existential threat to the state of Israel; one that can and will be used by AIPAC to pressure members of the House of Representatives and the Senate to pass legislation effectively shutting down the open internet as we know it.

The 6 month pending deadline should be just enough time for Israel’s massive propaganda machine.

After Israel’s Dec. 2008-Jan. 2009 attack on Gaza,  their more recent attack on the humanitarian aid flotilla, and the assassination of a Palestinian public official, their public opinion rating has taken a nose-dive. Their megaphoned apologists and their public relations efforts failed in the face of an open and uncensored internet.

Assange’s new, unexplainable, 6 month deadline creates just enough of a pending existential threat to the state of Israel to justify AIPAC influenced U.S. congressmen to pass a draconian internet censoring bill in the same vein as the U.S. Patriot Act.

This serves not only the state of Israel, but also the U.S. state department. After Hillary Clinton’s failed efforts to frame North Korea for the sinking of the Cheonan, it is in the best interest of the imperial U.S. that the freedom of the internet and the rapid exchange of information is curbed. This is ultimately the point of the Wikileaks psyop and at least now we have a definitive time-line.

(The following Julian Assange quotes taken from an interview on al Jazeera and published by Information Clearinghouse)

topic: holding “leaks” pertaining to Israel for 6 months

There are 3,700 files related to Israel and the source of 2,700 files is Israel. In the next six months we intend to publish more files depending on our sources,”

“We will publish 3700 files and the source is the American embassy in Tel Aviv. Prime Minister Netanyahu was traveling to Paris to talk to the US ambassador there. You will see more information about that in six months.”

Why would Assange hold important leaks about Israel for 6 months while knowingly allowing establishment newspapers to publish misleading information about North Korea, Iran, Pakistan, and nearly every other Middle East country immediately?

topic: Assange aware that papers he gave “leaks” to are filtering the truth about Israel

files pertaining to the 2006 Lebanon War (Condi Rice’s war) –  “Yes there is some information about that and these files were classified as top secret.

files pertaining to the assassination of a Palestinian leader – “Yes there are some indication to this and may be some special reports published by newspapers. Mossad agents used Australian, British and European passports to travel to Dubai and there are diplomatic files about that.”

The Guardian, El-Pais and Le Monde have published only two percent of the files related to Israel due to the sensitive relations between Germany, France and Israel. Even New York Times could not publish more due to the sensitivities related to the Jewish community in the US,”

Assange is blaming these entities for filtering the “leaks” yet these cables are in his possession and he could do with them as he pleases. He’s allowing this to happen. Why? If getting out the “truth” is what Wikileaks is all about, why this convoluted and manipulated process?

topic: Official U.S. funding??!?

“We were the biggest institution receiving official funding from the US but after we released a video tape about killing people in cold blood in Iraq in 2007, the funding stopped and we had to depend on individuals for finance.”

What “official funding” is he talking about? Has this money been in place since even before Wikileaks started officially leaking anything? If you read the John Young emails, that would certainly seem to be the case.


It is my sincere hope that this latest ploy by Julian Assange finally exposes  this Wikileaks  psyop to journalists like Pilger and Greenwald.

By giving this arbitrary and pointless deadline, by creating an existential threat which can only benefit AIPAC lobbyists, Assange has finally exposed his purpose in such a way as there cannot be any more question as to what that purpose ultimately is: the end of the free and open internet.


UPDATE: A Raw Story headline completely misrepresents the substance of the article.

Israel destroyed Syrian nuclear reactor in 2007, leaked cable reveals

But the facts within the article show us how the Wikileaks psyop is still working to the advantage of Israel by promoting old, tired propaganda as “fact”.

“On September 6, 2007, Israel destroyed the nuclear reactor built by Syria secretly, apparently with North Korea’s help,” then US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice wrote in the cable published in Yediot Aharonot newspaper.

Our intelligence experts are convinced that the attack targeted by the Israelis is in fact an atomic reactor of the same type built by North Korea in Yongbyon,” she wrote in the message dated April 2008.

We have good reason to believe that the reactor was not built for peaceful purposes,” she said, adding the attack came only weeks before the reactor was to become operational.  Raw Story

Here is some “truth” being revealed by Wikileaks – a statement by Condi Rice which exonerates Israel for the aggressive and illegal strike on a Syrian facility in 2007 which also serves the dual purpose of implicating North Korea at a time when the U.S. and South Korea are doing everything they can to create a reason to “regime change” that nation.

This cable exposes nothing that we didn’t already know about the 2007 attack on the Syrian facility and actually promotes the previously debunked U.S. and Israeli claim that it was a reactor being made for weapons manufacturing purposes.

Clearly this is just more pro-Israel, anti-North Korea propaganda.

UPDATE 2: This shit is so f*cing stupid, it must be  being written by a 12-year-old. Now Manning the Magnanimous, is hoping that you will wish for a Happy Christmas for all the troops AND his captors at the detention center who, according to him, are torturing him. Gimmie a fucking break.

“I ask that everyone takes the time to remember those who are separated from their loved ones at this time due to deployment and important missions.

“Specifically, I am thinking of those that I deployed with and have not seen for the last seven months, and of the staff here at the Quantico Confinement Facility who will be spending their Christmas without their family.” Raw Story

I guess the propagandists writing this drivel figure they got everyone eating out of their hands because of writers like Greenwald and Pilger swallowing this shit hook line and sinker, so they might as well pepper all their sappy propaganda with even more sappy propaganda.

27 Responses

  1. To my eyes he was a shill from day one. Michael Moore wasted his money, or, maybe not?

  2. Yeah. Assange definitely couldn’t have issued his 6 month deadline from inside the can, could he?

  3. The question should be, why wasnt this information/propaganda released when thee other informations was released, that of, over the last few months, it also states that information/propaganda is and has been kept behind closed doors for resaons specified by other agents.
    So much for open exposure.
    So much for your truth, in addition to this comment just made, how is it your turth, when it entails other peoples information?

    Member of the freeborn

  4. Michael Moore is a bigger fake than Assange. His 911 distraction movie did much to throw people off the scent of truth early in the game. His ‘expose’ on the US health care crisis was really an effort to reinforce the myth that pills cure everything, big pharma was happy.
    Who is MM’s business manager? Or more importantly, who is the brother of his business manager?

    Now to wiki. Good on you for staying on this psy op shit fest, Mr. Loman. The aangirfan site has also been great on this topic.
    The ‘chatter’ on sites like yours has demonstrated that many people see through this propaganda op.
    The quick responses of well prepared trolls on comments boards with pro Assange talking points was very telling IMO. This half assed promise by Assange to get to Israel eventually is classic damage control to counter the truth tellers like this site.
    Your point about fake lefty sites supporting Assange is important. My shit list includes the vile Huffingtonpost, Alternet, TheNation, DemocracyNow, rawstory and AfterDowningStreet.

    Those sites engaged in some heavy censorship (no surprise for anyone who comments on them) of people who wanted to discuss the idea of Assange as useful foe to the elites so they could censor the www, sell war with Iran, and sell war with Korea.
    Those douchebag sites are worse than FoxNews.
    They take peace loving kind hearted people who oppose war and trick them into supporting it.

    I had an exchange at a small site I originally respected.
    I got the usual treatment from trolls and site insiders (Lina) showing how this Assange sell job has large and small players.
    comments #19 to 33 are a perfect summary of what happened on comment boards all over the world.

    Two other small examples of wiki advancing fascist goals.
    CBC the disgrace of Canada, heavily played up a negative wikileaks story on Cuba/human rights the day before Raul Castro announced the biggest pro democracy reforms in Cuban history.
    CBC also played up a wikileaks story about RCMP being ‘lax” on marijuana busts because they were too busy with the Olympics last year………..this in a year of record pot busts in Canada, and just a day after the Canadian Senate in silence passed a bill making a mandatory 6 month jail term for only 5 pot plants. This was NOT covered by Canadian media! Canada did have liberal pot laws, the envy of many of you Americans for years. The war on drugs is escalating. wiki helps.

    Sorry for the very long winded comment, and no worries if you don’t bother with the comment thread I linked. But it is interesting to see the identical troll tactics used at different blogs. I see you have had some very literate passionate commenters in support of Assange too……….
    Good luck, happy holidays and thanks for all your great work.

  5. while I can’t answer the 3rd point, the first two are fairly simple misunderstandings.

    topic: holding “leaks” pertaining to Israel for 6 months

    wikileaks, although well-known, has a likely rather stretched staff. translating and vetting all of the docs take a while. if these steps weren’t taken, they’d be getting jumped on for not doing so (even though people mistakenly think they don’t do so already–generally these people are ones who’ve done little research on the topic and are repeating what they’ve heard from the MSM or elsewhere.)

    topic: Assange aware that papers he gave “leaks” to are filtering the truth about Israel

    the full cables are available on the website after they’re given to the large papers. anyone interested in seeing unfiltered facts are absolutely able to do so. he’s not the boss of all of the news outlets.

  6. their staff isn’t vetting anything, the New York Times and other complicit news agencies are with the help of the Obama administration, or do I have to link you to a editor at the Times who admitted that already?

    but Julian didn’t HAVE to give the leaks to these globalist institutions in the first place, did he?

    In FACT, he doesn’t have to wait to give them to anyone else, does he?

    so that line of spin is bullshit. He’s already stated that he has read a thousand of the Israel Leaks… why not release those?

  7. But, you know what, they did have the TIME to release the fabrication that North Korea helped Syria make a nuclear plant in order to make nuclear weapons.

    Julian did have TIME to get around to releasing that one, now didn’t he?

    Just in time to stoke the fires for regime change in North Korea.

    go figure.

  8. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael Rivero, p.a.turner. p.a.turner said: Latest Wikileaks Psyop Maneuver: Providing Israel With Another Useful Existential Threat: […]

  9. Merry Christmas, Scott.

    You put an incredible amount of work into this site. Thank you.

    This is the Mother of all Fridays for dumping news. Maybe that is what this Assange bull is about: 1) hardly anyone is paying attention right now, and 2) six months from now we’ll be so screwed no one will care? I hope that is not the case.

  10. Assage maybe telling truth here and there, but when revelation of the truth is timed to serve an agenda then this becomes deception and his truth becomes doubtful.

    As far as I know, I think 2011 is going to be an extremely bloody year. Lebanon, Gaza and maybe Iran are going to be parties. US and Israel may have a quick victory which will be their defeat.

  11. @willyloman

    “their staff isn’t vetting anything, the New York Times and other complicit news agencies are with the help of the Obama administration, or do I have to link you to a editor at the Times who admitted that already?”

    yes, please link this.

    “but Julian didn’t HAVE to give the leaks to these globalist institutions in the first place, did he?”

    if an organization is interested in drawing attention to abuses of power, it only makes sense to attempt to work with information disseminators that distribute widely, such as large MSM sources.

  12. Assange has stated in his interview that WikiLeaks has a “business relationship” with the five establishment rags that gives them an exclusive, he did not say how long, but presumabl 6 months. WikiLeaks was PAID for this – i.e., a “business relationship”. Whether the organization needs this money or it is going into the Assange legal defense fund or whether it is going into the Assange hooker fund I don’t know, but at least get your facts straight. Every organization needs financing and on the cover this is a plausible story. And doubly stupid to lie, since these publications would immediatel issue a denial if it were not true.

    I still don’t know if Wikileaks is a psyops, is being manipulated by a psyops, or is legit. I don’t think many people – who claim to know it all do either. Before getting all riled up, give him 6 months and see what happens.

    And the internet will NOT be shut over this. For crying out loud, what could these cables possibly say? Maybe a repeat of the Goldstone Report, at worst, and we all know that one didn’t shut the ‘net down. STOP CRYING WOLF, for crying out loud!

  13. Here is a quote from David Sanger’s interview…

    ” “… We’re explaining what’s important here and what’s not. And we’re filtering it out to try to avoid the greatest harm to individuals (like Israel, India?), ongoing operations and so forth.

    … you know, had we waited until this all just appeared on the Internet and then tried to catch up with it… but we would not have had any real time to digest it or certainly to think as hard as we did about what should and shouldn’t be redacted.

    … But we were concerned at the Times, and it’s one of the reasons that we went through so carefully to try to redact material that we thought could be damaging to individuals or undercut ongoing operations. And we even took the very unusual step of showing the 100 cables or so that we were writing from to the U.S. government and asking them if they had additional redactions to suggest.” Sanger

    It’s from a PBS interview on a show called Fresh Air…

    a little info on Sanger…

    “David E. Sanger, Washington Correspondent of the New York Times, worked closely with Wikileaks. He was involved in the distribution, editing and dissemination of the leaked documents.

    Sanger is member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Aspen Strategy Group together with Madeleine K. Albright, Richard Hass, R Talbott, Robert.B. Zoellick (president of the World Bank), and Philip Zelikow (formerly executive director of the 9/11 Commission)

    We have highlighted a number of important statements in the first part of this interview, which confirm that the NYT has not only been involved in the selection and redacting of the Wikileaks documents, it has they also undertaken these activities in consultation with the US government.”

    No, I am sorry. You don’t hand over important “truths” to globalist organizations to be selected by CFR members working with Obama administration officials.

    That’s not a “leak”, that’s a fraud.

  14. “give him 6 months and see what happens.”

    you know, that is what they used to say each time Bush wanted an extension on his wars… “just give it 6 more months…”

    yeah, give him 6 months, see what happens. and if they start censoring the internet during that time, heck, we can always start printing flyers, right?

  15. The motif of that “dead line”?

    maybe because of something technical.

    Why should many commentators feel theatened?

    Maybe something to do with paranoia.

    If so, why so many people are paranoid?

    Maybe because of Divine justice; pride leads to punishment

  16. “…their staff isn’t vetting anything, the New York Times and other complicit news agencies are with the help of the Obama administration, or do I have to link you to a editor at the Times who admitted that already?”

    Please do link that article- havent seen it and it is VERY important. Right up there with the info that Julian was hosted by the US Ambassador to Iceland at the US Embassy’s parties in the last year.

    Michael Moore’s agent is Rahm Emanuel’s brother. Raw Story =RAW SEWAGE. It is another CIA-Mossad affiliated front site that wont publish the real deal on Israel. It too pretends to have scoops but their scoops are usually stuff covered elsewhere on other sites long before that they have simply ignored as if it didnt exist. RS then spins their own version and claims to be “the source”. I have watched them pull this tactic many times and people believe it.!
    “Insider” Intelligence-backed Raw Story is a fitting precursor to intel-backed Wiki-weazelry. Sort of a Debka-lite site.

  17. @ willyloman

    sorry, but just because the times is doing their own vetting, *doesn’t prove that wikileaks isn’t*. it makes sense that the MSM would make their own discriminations when it comes to what to publish. that doesn’t disprove that wikileaks has their own vetting process, nor does it disprove the fact that the documents that the MSM choose not to publish are still quite available to see on the wikileaks site.

  18. Buyer Beware:

    I’ve come to the same conclusion about Raw Story. Will be taking their link off my site in a few hours.

  19. I’m liking this site more and more.

    Well done against WikiLeaks. On the =party site, we made the same conclusion when we put together, for examples, the bs that the Pentagon was “hunting Assange,” and the fact that WikiLeaks edits/redacts the supposed leaks. Redacting is what the CIA does. A true whistleblowing wikileaker wouldn’t redact (blackout, censor, erase) anything.

    As for Glenn Greenwald, he obviously has great powers of reasoning. Therefore, when you review his positions on a list of important issues — such as Free Speech, who controls banking and other corrupted businesses and institutions — you can see that he chooses not to reason his way any higher than American criminal sources. He’s part of the anti-American Fake Left. He’s playing his role. There’s no reasonable doubt.

    Reminder: We have our criminals, for sure. But they’re Number 2 in the world. The Rothschild males are Number 1, and they are the true, supreme common enemy of all decent Americans and of all decent people on the planet.

    Assange is just another twig on their tree. He’s just another wrench in their massive toolbox. And bear in mind, he doesn’t necessarily have to be aware of that fact.

    As for other columnists and websites who are also tools, whether they fully know it or not, just look at the bottom of the HuffingtonPost homepage. They conveniently give a large list of the propagandists. RawStory is there. I’ve checked out most of those sites over the last two years. Don’t waste your time thinking any of them are going to “wake up” or whatever.

    We are the new leaders. We are growing in number.

  20. ANonymouse is a diligent troll, but he has very little to work with. His ludicrous statement about why you should use corrupt complicit proven (NYTimes) liars to tell your story………

    “if an organization is interested in drawing attention to abuses of power, it only makes sense to attempt to work with information disseminators that distribute widely, such as large MSM sources.”

    Well mousy, your ridiculous assumption that the Times is interested in drawing attention to abuses of power is pathetic. The Times protects power by confusing its readers. It does not make sense to work with people who favor war and the status quo if your goal is to change things.
    JeezeLouise, the Assange backers are looking more desperate and silly with each passing day.

  21. My personal favorite is the one who suggested we should just sit back and wait 6 months to see what happens.

    There’s a good idea huh? If someone breaks into your home and is hovering over your bed eying your wife while unzipping his pants, I guess one should just sit back and wait for 10 minutes or so just to see what happens.


  22. Hi Mike,

    By diligent do you mean engaging in civil discourse? Or do you mean following the links and responding to the subject at hand? Just curious. Sorry you find the Times so confusing (?). My method is to use some of the MSM (obviously 90% of the mass media is fairly rubbish) to take leads from and do further research. I wish I could say most of it’s readers do the same, but I suppose that is not true. Still no one addresses that Wikileaks doesn’t rely solely on the MSM to disseminate the leaks, but provides source material from which to investigate on its website.

  23. We should always consider the possibility that Assange is withholding an attack against the Zionist media until such time as Wikileaks has developed sufficient profile and credibility to be reported by the competitive non-Zionist media.

    It is what I would do, were I Julian Assange.

    On the other hand, I have yet to see evidence that Assange has more than a superficial grasp of geopolitics.

    Notwithstanding these elements, Wikileaks has spawned a plethora of lookalike leaksites that are not Zionist-controlled; and many of which are dedicatedly anti-Zionist.

    So, if Assange seems Murdoch-friendly, I say who gives a AF?

  24. The Bible call them impostors,fake,liars and,,the Synagogue of satan(Revelation 2:9,,3:9)
    To understand the truth,please read this book for free.
    Who Is Esau-Edom…Who Is Esau-Edom.

    Relates that the Khazar(Ashkenaz)Jews were/are the sons of Japheth not Shem
    Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah,Shem,Ham,and Japheth:and unto them were sons born after the flood.The sons of Japheth;the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz.
    Genesis 10:1-3
    Bible proves that [Khazars jews] are not Semite.

  25. anonymouse.
    No I do NOT find the disgusting NY Times confusing, you lying sack of shit. I do find it to be an establishment propaganda outlet, be it by fudging death figures on the Iraq war, hyping the false WMD story when they knew it was false, with holding red cross reports on torture in election periods, lying about Iran etc. etc.
    Your pathetic shilling for them as some sort of credible information source shows you to be very very out of touch with the readers at this site.
    I see you are fastidious in your avoidance of the Assange leaks being used to sell more war against Iran and Korea, being used to sell internet censorship, and his ties to spooks and establishment media oligarchs.

    Tony Ryan, you are famous!! Here is a story about you.

  26. @ Mike

    Your lack of reading comprehension and oddly aggressive retorts do a disservice to your argument, IMO. Good bye!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: