The Legacy of Mr. Deets

 by Scott Creighton

I wrote the script that I was reading. I was and am completely OK in making that statement.” Dwain Deets

Mr. Deets and I are having another discussion. Feel free to join in, if you like.

He seems to think that statements from Pentagon and Department of the Army employees regarding the events of Sept. 11th 2001, are more reliable than “aeronautical principles” when it comes to scientific investigations.   ಠ_ಠ

I tend to disagree.

His statement seems an odd position for someone with his background to offer, but, there it is. And he stands behind it… though at the same time, he dismisses vast parts of those same testimonies for those very same withnesses such as many of them claim they saw Flight 77 hit the Pentagon and not a single one of them “witnessed” it “fly over” the building.

Mr. Deets accepts part of the DoD witness testimony and rejects other parts… and, according to Mr. Deets, that is the “logical” approach one should take over “aeronautical principles” in our ongoing unofficial investigation into the events of 9/11.

Does that really sound like the Truth movement we have all been part of these many years? Is that the kind of ‘logic” this movement is based on?

As illogical as that statement Mr. Deets made would seem to be, it forces me to consider that perhaps he has a reason to be doing everything he can in order to keep Truth advocates from considering the obvious answer to the question of what happened at the Pentagon on Sept. 11th 2001… which is perhaps his real legacy.

The more he tries to spin up ridiculous propaganda like the CIT supporting video and the comment he left here today, which belittles his education, his accomplishment, and his obvious intelligence, the more I have to assume he has a very powerful motivation to do so.

3 Responses

  1. I don’t get it – how would Deets’ agreement with the ‘fly over’ witnesses draw attention away from the drone theory? Surely if he agreed with ‘Flight 77 hit the Pentagon’ witnesses, this would bring less attention on the drone theory?

    The whole argument is pointless keeping in mind the lack of physical/video evidence from the Pentagon though…

  2. What the “fly over” theory does is it puts Flight 77 at the Pentagon… gets the Truth movement believing that the plane was actually there. Then its a short hop to south of the Citgo and Jim Hoffman’s “Believe the Official Story” distraction.

    Its also rather outragous to think that the 757 flew over the Pentagon and no one saw it.

    But the most important part of the ‘fly over” theory is the explosives pre-planted in the building.

    Everything BUT a drone or a missile, which of course, is what did hit the Pentagon.

  3. First picture that comes to me when I think of that day is one of a woman and a man holding hands, streaming headlong down alongside of one of those towers into whatever waited for them.

    She was wearing a sweater, skirt, and loafers. He had on a white shirt, tie, slacks, and probably wingtips. That’s all I know about them. I hope whatever parents, or siblings, or spouses, or children they might have left behind were spared seeing the horror of that picture.

    But when I think of everything I saw that day, it doesn’t seem so much like the work of angry people as it does the plotting of coldblooded people–people in charge of the research, development, and manufacture of too many new kinds of bullets and who needed a new war to spend them in.

    r ap

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: