All in the Family; The Globalist Kagans of Brooklyn

Elena Kagan must produce her entire family lineage prior to her confirmation hearings and this is why…

 by Scott Creighton  

Elena Kagan will be the next Supreme Court justice as she was just announced as President Obama’s choice to fill the seat of one of the last real liberals left on the Supreme Court, Justice John Paul Stevens.  The right won’t oppose her except in some sort of pretend way and the left is already doing strained back flips trying to make her into some kind of “pragmatic” liberal in disguise.  The only disguise she ever wore was the same one worn by Hilary Clinton and Bill Clinton and Barack Obama… i.e. the neoliberal Corporatist in Democrat Clothing disguise.  

Birds of a Feather?

It’s a shame because not only is Elena Kagan perhaps the most unqualified person to ever be nominated to the Supreme Court, but she is a neoliberal globalist hack who had the silver spoon of privilege surgically implanted in her Kagan rectum at birth. To say that the court may “move to the right” when she is confirmed is a bit like saying Cheney “stretched the truth a little” about Iraq. It’s a laughable and contemptuous understatement that exposes one’s cynical sycophantic approval of the systemic rot that infects our country.  

Kagan has never set foot as an attorney of record into a trial courtroom in the United States, not even a small claims justice court; nor for that matter, any appellate court save for the literally handful of spoon fed cases she suddenly worked on as Solicitor General. Kagan has never been a judge in any courtroom, of any court, in the United States. Empty Wheel  

Yes, she will probably glide through confirmation, grinning and smiling and loving all the attention just like any spoiled child of privilege would upon receiving some special award only she thinks she actually earned. She might actually be the last person in the world to understand how she got where she is, how she got the “right” offers from the “right” law firms and the “right” appointments in the White House.  She may never really understand why it is that her life has been so blessed by all the neoliberals around her who keep making sure there has always been a place at the Big Table for her.  She might not understand it, but the rest of the politico class moving through the Washington Consensus certainly does as they dutifully kiss her ass as she effortlessly breezes past them up that DC ladder.  

But you see there is a reason for that… her uncle is probably Donald Kagan, one of the fathers of neoconservativism (the “right” branch of neoliberalism) and a founder of the Project for the New American Century. The republicans won’t oppose her and the Clinton controlled “liberals” in congress will be afraid to raise even the slightest objection to a woman sitting on the most powerful court in the land who has never rendered a verdict in her life and who has barely even set foot in a courtroom.  And yet, somehow or another, the “progressive” media will swoon over her regardless of the fact that she is quite probably the niece of one of the biggest neocon traitors this country has ever known.  

Let’s see if we can make sense of this shall we?  


A little background…  

 The blogs are all abuzz about Hilary Clinton’s choice for the Supreme Court. Let’s face it, the Obama administration is owned by the Clintons. Larry Summers and Rubin and all the other Clinton administration retreads prove that point out beyond any kind of rational debate. Hilary recently put her loathsome husband in charge of “rebuilding” Haiti, a nation he admits to having crippled with his first attempt at imposing his neoliberal IMF style “structural reforms”.  But the Clinton’s didn’t make the choice any more than Obama did, really. It was time for payback; a tribute to one of the founding families of the globalist neoliberal era that we now call the bipartisan Washington Consensus… the Kagan family.  

Elena Kagan is a globalist. She is a corporatist and a neoliberal shill for the coming IMF style austerity programs that are bound to be slammed onto this nation just as soon as the election is over.  

Elena Kagan and the Goldman Sachs Globalists  

Kagan’s recent stint with Goldman Sachs deserves a much closer look than the complicit media are providing. All they are saying is that she didn’t work with the specific group that bundled garbage and sold it to cities and states knowing it was going to cripple them and us in the process.  Nor did she work for the part of Goldman Sachs that then made billions betting against the investments of their clients, like the state of Florida for example.  

The conclusion the media comes to is that since she wasn’t directly involved in those specific branches of Goldman Sachs, there is no story, no conflict of interest, so we should all move on and forget about her connections to the politically connected bank that committed a treasonous act against America.   

I beg to differ.  

Fact is, she worked for Goldman Sachs for 4 years, from 2005 to 2008, with the Research Advisory Council of Goldman Sachs Global Markets Institute.  This is Goldman Sachs’ GLOBALIZATION DEPARTMENT and it is run by a group of IMF, World Bank, and Council on Foreign Relations swine.  

The Global Markets Institute at Goldman Sachs provides research and high-level advisory services to policymakers, regulators and investors around the world. Goldman Page  

What changes are needed in current policy frameworks to create the necessary market demand and liquidity in an effective carbon trading scheme? Carbon Credits derivatives scheme  

Elena Kagan and the Clinton/DLC Globalists  

She began her career working at Williams and Connelly law firm; famous for their neocon/neoliberal connections…  

Recent high-profile cases include the successful defense of U.S. President Clinton’s impeachment, representation of Enron‘s law firm Vinson & Elkins… defense of the Vioxx cases… In past years the firm represented Colonel Oliver North during the Iran-Contra Affair, and defended John Hinckley, the would-be assassin of President ReaganWiki  

“From 1995 to 1999, Kagan served as President Bill Clinton’s Associate White House Counsel and Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and Deputy Director of the Domestic Policy Council.”  

Bruce Reed, who would hire her as his deputy when he ran the White House Domestic Policy Council under President Bill Clinton.. Times  

Bruce Reed is CEO of the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC). He is credited with coining the welfare reform catchphrase, “end welfare as we know it.” Wiki  

 In 2006 he co-authored the highly influential book The Plan with White House Chief of Staff and former Congressman Rahm Emanuel.  DLC page  

Elena Kagan and the Neocon Globalists  

“Kagan has said ‘I love the Federalist Society.’ This is a right-wing group; almost all of the Bush administration lawyers responsible for its war and torture memos are members of the Federalist Society. Many members of the Federalist Society say that Brown v. Board of Education [which struck down ‘separate but equal’] was decided wrongly.  

… “As dean of the Harvard Law School, Kagan hired Bush’s outgoing director of the Office of Legal Counsel, Jack Goldsmith, as a law professor. Goldsmith is regarded by me and many others in the field as a war criminal. He wrote some of the memos that attempted to make violations of the Geneva Conventions appear legal.  

… “During the course of her Senate confirmation hearings as Solicitor General, Kagan explicitly endorsed the Bush administration’s bogus category of ‘enemy combatant,’ whose implementation has been a war crime in its own right. Now in her current job as U.S. Solicitor General, Kagan is quarterbacking the continuation of the Bush administration’s illegal and unconstitutional positions in U.S. federal court litigation around the country, including in the U.S. Supreme Court. IPA  

Since becoming Solicitor General of the United States, Ms. Kagan has taken many unpopular positions on cases before the Supreme Court that needs to be reviewed by the public. The first set of cases that comes to mind are the political prosecution cases in Alabama and Mississippi. In one of the cases, Ms. Kagan has asked that the Supreme Court not review the United States vs. Siegelman matter. This is contrary to ninety-one US Attorney Generals demanding that the Supreme Court hear the case because of all the abuses of power by the prosecuting team from the DOJ and the United States attorney’s office from the Middle District of Alabama. Clearly to ignore this matter one has to wonder about Ms. Kagan’s possible Neocon roots. Jill Simpson  

So Why Is It?  

So why is it that this supposedly liberal law student gets thrust into the mainstream neoliberal/neocon circles as soon as she popped out of her Ivy League school? Why is it that she hires a shamed neocon straight from George Bush’s “Fuck the Geneva Convention” memo staff? And why is it that she works diligently under the neoliberal Clinton/Obama regime to protect all those neocon war criminals from the Halcyon Bush days?  

Well, simply put, it might be because she is related to several of the men who would be arrested if anyone started investigating the criminality of the neocons during the Bush years.  Yeah, it might be that simple.  

Elena Kagan and Donald Kagan, the Father of Modern Neocons.  

Trying to find anything about Elena Kagan’s paternal grandfather is a bit like being poor and black and trying to find a good paying job in Bill Clinton’s New Haiti, ain’t gonna happen. But there might be a good reason for that; he may have died in Lithuania.  You see, it’s my contention that Elena Kagan’s paternal grandfather, Robert Kagan’s father, is also the father of Donald Kagan.  

I’ve been trying to put this connection together for some time, which has delayed the publication of this post by quite a bit. As many bloggers are finding out, this isn’t easy to figure out. So let’s start with what we know.  

If Elena Kagan is related to Robert Kagan (PNAC, Council on Foreign Relations, American Enterprise Institute, “Rebuilding Americas Defenses’… “New Pearl Harbor Type event“) and Fred Kagan (PNAC and the Surge plan, American Enterprise Institute, “Rebuilding Americas Defenses”… “New Pearl Harbor Type Event…”) as well as Donald Kagan (founder of the PNAC, “Rebuilding Americas Defenses”… “New Pearl Harbor Type Event“…) then when she was working in the Obama administration to keep from investigating the crimes of the Bush-era neocons, well in fact, she was actually covering up for her family. She was keeping her uncle and her cousins out of prison.  

So this is an important question, the question of her paternal grandfather, that should be investigated about someone who could very well be the next Supreme Court Justice.  

This is what Elena Kagan said today about her nomination to the Supreme Court.  

“If this day has just a touch of sadness in it for me, it is because my parents aren’t here to share it. They were both, as the president said, the children of immigrants and the first in their families to go to college,” Kagan said.  UPI  

Let’s see what we know and how it applies to what she said today about her parents and theirs.  

Robert Kagan is Elena Kagan’s father. He was born in Brooklyn in 1927 or 1928 and he died in 1994 at the age of 67.  

Donald Kagan’s family immigrated to Brooklyn from Lithuania when he was 2 years old when his father died. He was born in 1932.  Now it is possible that the Kagans had been in Brooklyn prior to going to Lithuania and Robert was born then, or that Robert Kagan’s father met and married the widow Kagan (Donald’s mother) when she immigrated after Donald’s father died.   

This much we know… IF Donald Kagan is Elena Kagan’s uncle, the statement she made today holds true to that narrative.  Her parents WERE the children of immigrants AND Robert, being the oldest son, WOULD have been the first to go to college.  

Donald Kagan went to Brooklyn College which is affiliated with Hunter College. Elena went to a Ivy League college prep high school, Hunter College High School.  

Donald Kagan is something of a neoliberal/neocon legend. He grew up as a “New Deal Liberal” but the stark realities of the civil rights movement seemed to scare him straight, or at least that is his story. Donald Kagan would go from a “New Deal Liberal” to someone who believed that “War is the default state of the human species.” Yale Alumni mag.  That’s quite a shift and it’s the heart of the neoliberal philosophy.  

“I used to believe that peace was the normal situation for humanity, but the more I looked, the more I saw that peace was very rare,” he says. “Wars are happening all the time, so I had to ask, ‘Why is there ever peace?‘”  Donald Kagan  

However, he didn’t really start pushing his different agenda at Yale until 1971, by his own admission.  

Kagan brought that principled, and, some would say, uncompromising, even autocratic, turn-to-the-right to Yale. “I started giving [then-President] Kingman Brewster serious grief in 1971, and I have been a pain in the ass ever since,” says Kagan, a measure of pride and amusement in his voice. “To punish me, I’ve been given a steady stream of honors and administrative positions.”  Yale  

Also in 1971, Lewis Powell wrote his now famous “Powell Memo”, “Attack on the American Free Enterprise System.”, to the US Chamber of Commerce. In it Lewis Powell, who would also later become a Supreme Court Justice, detailed a careful plan to destroy liberal ideology in America because it threatened the corporate power structure. This memo was responsible for the creation of think-tanks like the Cato Institute, the Project for the New American Century, the Heritage Foundation, and American Enterprise Institute just to name a few. These are pro-corporate, anti-liberal think-tanks which promote neoliberal, crony free-trade capitalism.  

Donald Kagan would start-up PNAC himself and his sons would belong to many of these think tanks.  

The previous decade had seen the increasing regulation of many industries. Powell argued, “The most disquieting voices joining the chorus of criticism came from perfectly respectable elements of society: from the college campus, the pulpit, the media, the intellectual and literary journals, the arts and sciences, and from politicians.” In the memorandum, Powell advocated “constant surveillance” of textbook and television content, as well as a purge of left-wing elementsWiki  

It would appear that Donald Kagan took this memo as a call to action.  His transition from a “New Deal liberal” was complete.  

In 2000, Donald Kagan wrote with his son, Fred, a book called “While America Sleeps: Self-Delusion, Military Weakness, and the Threat to Peace Today”  In that book, he and his son explain that America was in danger and that we would be attacked by those who hate us for our freedom if we don’t militarize the shit out of the country and hand over more government control to corporations.  

“America is in danger,” the Kagans wrote. “Unless its leaders change their national security policy, the peace and safety its power and influence have insured since the end of the Cold War will disappear.” Yale  

Was Kagan lucky? Was he just so damned gifted that he understood the natural state of man, WAR, was about to reassert itself….  

or was something else afoot?  


I can’t say from this entire day of investigation that I have proven that Elena Kagan is related to the war-criminals she should have investigated while she worked in the Obama administration. But I can say this;  

Elena Kagan’s past, her affinity for the neocons of the Bush administration, her automatic inclusion into the neoliberal Obama and Clinton regimes, her stance on executive power and the Global War on Terror, as well as statements she has made about her family past, all points to one solid conclusion…  

Elena Kagan should be forced to produce authenticated documentation about her family lineage prior to being confirmed as a Supreme Court Justice.  

We all know at this point that she is a corporatist and that she is not qualified to sit on the bench of the Supreme Court.  The question therefore must be WHY is she being considered and HOW has she risen to this position in 49 short years when she has so little to show for them?  

I firmly believe that if we were to uncover her family lineage, then we would understand a great deal more about how she has become the next neocon nominee to sit on the Supreme Court.

33 Responses

  1. Great report, Scott. Another nail in the coffin of justice in the USA or possibly just down another notch into the hell that we will have to fight our way out of starting on SHTF Day!

  2. The resemblance is uncanny. They could be triplets.

  3. you should write a book.

  4. For the fact that she has supported criminals, should be enough reason to keep her off the Supreme Court.

    and you got that right, BuelahMan…. they could be triplets!

  5. You’re off your rocker . . . “Kagan” is one of the most common Jewish names, it’s a variant of Cohen. There are literally hundreds of different Kagans who are not related to each other.

  6. ah, there you have it. Since there are other people named Kagan, all the rest of the facts are mere coincidence.

    Yes, I and others who helped, researched the history of the name “Kagan” and yes, it is a variation of the name “Cohen”.

    But, as I said before in the conclusion, I have not been able to prove that they are related, but there is enough evidence to show a possible link between them and that should be enough to merit a simple investigation into her family lineage.

  7. Is her picture the one on the far left or in the middle? Your research/conclusions seem reasonable but what I found most interesting is that you said, “(Elena Kagan is) perhaps the most unqualified person to ever be nominated to the Supreme Court”. The comparison can be made between her and Obama being the most unqualified person to ever be elected President. She needs to withdraw herself as nominee… Just like Obama needs to resign (or be impeached)…

  8. They look like they could be related. If they are, it is a fact that should be known before she replaces our token liberal on the Corporate is Supreme Court.

  9. This person is kinda scarey. She supports indefinitely detaining terror suspects without trial. Supports censorship of TV,Radio, Posters and pamphlets. Thinks certain expressions of free speech should be disappered if govt. deems them to be offensive. Wow!

  10. New to this blog. There are well over 100 Kagan families in Brooklyn alone. Whether or not she is related is irrelevant. Were the Marx Brothers Communists?

    There are two prominent neo-liberals who share my own last name, but I am neither related to them, nor share their views.

    One can also have radically different views than members of one’s own family.

    The main point is that she supports the neo-liberal globalization project, as do most world leaders, and for this reason alon should be opposed.

    Experience is irrelevant also. I would support a bus driver to be a member of the Supreme Court — if they had any intelligence and honesty to represent working people. Any bright person could understand the legal issues posed by various cases.

  11. PS wish you had a preview button.

  12. “Whether or not she is related is irrelevant”

    The only reason you give as to why she should be opposed is because she supports economic view as “most world leaders”?

    That is supposed to be your argument? That statement is supposed to buy you credibility? What do you think this is, ThinkProgress?

    If she is related to two of the leading neocons who helped create George Bush’s Global War on Terror (Global Free Market Wars), it would be Extremely relevant since she has effectively helped ensure that the neocons of the Bush administration won’t be investigated for creating an illegal war of aggression.

    In fact, if she is related to them, she has been using her position to help shield her own family members from prosecution…

    that is illegal and would immediately disqualify her from the Supreme Court appointment.

    So yes, it is relevant.

    Obviously you contradict yourself when you say in one line that family members CAN have differing points of view, and then you admit she shares the neoliberal/neocon viewpoint in your very next sentance.

    You then go on to say that her lack of experience is irrelevant to a Justice of the Highest court in the land.

    Clearly you are just here to attempt some backhanded PR spin on her behalf.

    Experience is relevent, it tells us what this person stands for, what they have ruled in the past and on what legal basis… and therefore, from that, we learn what one can expect of her when she is seated on the bench.

    I’m not even going to comment on the stupidity of your Marx Brothers comment.

    PS I should set the comments on this blog to accept only people who don’t work for a big PR firm… and who are paid to have whatever joke of an opinion they actually think they have. You are probably better suited spinning in the controlled opposition sites like TP or Kos. You should stick to that. Have your supervisor sent some of his specialists over next time. Your hamhanded delivery stands out like a sore thumb here.

  13. So what are the qualifications required to sit on the SCOTUS? Did I miss it or did you not point it out through your very personal and emotional exposition?

    Also, don’t you feel it’s a little hypocritical to refer to someone as a globalist (as a bad thing) while blogging on the internet?

  14. “globalism” is not the enevitable shrinking of the distances between one people and another, as the PR (propagandists) shills would try and have you believe.

    “globalism’ is the ongoing effort to impose IMF/World Bank “structural reforms” and fiscal policy control on every single nation on the planet. for an example, just Google “Global Free Market Wars” and you will get an idea of what I am talking about.

    “globalism” is the pursuit of neoliberal free-market (actually it’s crony capitalism) ideology as demonostratied by the economic hitmen of the CIA over the past 6 decades and as carefully explained by Naomi Klein in several of her books, but best in “Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism”

    so …. no. The “internet” is not “globlization” as the term is being used in the article above, no more than the telegraph was, the postal service was, the phone was, or the radio was. These things bring us together while globlism is driving us apart.

  15. Good stuff , let me know how it turns out after making up all of this bullsh@t about her family

  16. Maybe she is a Kargan. See the movie Higlander.

    Then we’d be up the creek.

  17. Thanks for your clear response. And I agree that this new form of empire building is quite insidious.

    I also agree that we do not have enough information to know whether Ms. Kagan supports the IMF doctrines.

    But this IS the world that we live in. It’s encouraging that you’re doing something to make change.

  18. Greg:

    You are right, this is the world we live in and we all have to do the best we can, in whatever capasity, to make it a liitle better. Now whether that is for our families, our communities, our nations, or the world… we each do as can and as we see our obligations.

    I have to admit, this article of mine does not prove who her grandfather was. It does go a long way to show her other family ties and how they seem to be following in that same neoliberal path, but ultimately there just is not enough background info on her to know for sure.

    I find that, in a way, to be a confirmation of sorts. How can they be picking a Supreme Court Justice and not know who her grandfather was. My guess is, everyone knows, which is why she is going to fly through confirmation without a hitch.

    But we know this much, her past writing and the affiliation with the neoliberal Clintons, her protection of the Bush administration, her affinity for the Federalist Society… her agreement with the concept of the unitary executive powers… this all points to the strong possibility that Elena Kagan, much like Obama before her, is NOT what she seems.

  19. will,

    You said this,

    “…If she is related to two of the leading neocons who helped create George Bush’s Global War on Terror (Global Free Market Wars), it would be Extremely relevant since she has effectively helped ensure that the neocons of the Bush administration won’t be investigated for creating an illegal war of aggression.

    In fact, if she is related to them, she has been using her position to help shield her own family members from prosecution…

    that is illegal and would immediately disqualify her from the Supreme Court appointment.

    So yes, it is relevant…”

    I agree that what you here bring up is a relevant point to make. It would be a good question to ask Kagan while she’s under oath.

    My understanding of Kagan as a nominee isn’t very deep. I’ve been told she has tried to express as little of her actual views as possible just so that, if she were ever to be in this position, she would not have a paper trail that might be used against her.

    My understanding of Obama has been that he has been devoted to the neocon agenda. He has not prosecuted Bush or any of his underlings for crimes under national or international law, and, instead of changing back to what we had before that was legal and legit, Obama has under his own name promoted policies that are as bad if not worse than Bush’s. So, for example, whereas Bush just wanted to spy on us, so that he could protect us for terrorists, now Obama can just kill us in order to protect us from terrorists.

    From what you have argued here, Ms. Kagan has used her position to facilitate these practices. That ius, she has prevented the prosecution of people in the Bush administration that should have been because we have good reason to accuse them of breaking the law.

    You’re argument is that Obama screwed up and hired someone who had a conflict of interest. Not only was she following Obama’s orders and protecting likely felons, but the likely felons she was protecting were members of her own family.

    I think the main problem is that Obama has had his staff protect likely felons. The fact that he hired people with possible conflicts of interest, that is, if Ms. Kagan is related to these people, just makes it worse.

    The attempt to have such a person put on the SCOTUS seems to just be an attempt to prevent any prosecution or punishment for Bush and his underlings who, for various reasons, we have reason to believe have broken the law.

    This is such a great issue to investigate.

  20. steve;

    remember, the neocon agenda is the neoliberal agenda, they are one and the same.

    Talk about coming full circle, the original neocons were actually democrats from Scoop Jackson’s office and the Lewis Powell Memo was written by a guy who would be sitting of the Supreme Court 2 months later…

  21. will,

    Others have investigated this question of yours and came up with,

    Is the new Supreme Court nominee related to Donald, Robert, or Frederick Kagan?
    By Cecile DehesdinPosted Monday, May 10, 2010, at 6:28 PM ET

    Now that President Obama has nominated Solicitor General Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court, the Explainer wants to know: Is Elena related to Donald, Robert, or Frederick W. Kagan?

    No. Fifty-year-old Elena Kagan is the former dean of Harvard Law School, where she earned her J.D. She also taught at the University of Chicago and spent four years in the Clinton administration. She was born in New York City to public schoolteacher Gloria and lawyer Robert Kagan (but not the Robert Kagan), both deceased.

    Elena Kagan does have two brothers, but they’re not famous. (Marc and Irving are both teachers, like their mother.) She is in no way related to the other famous Kagans—but they are related to one another. Robert and Frederick W. Kagan are Donald Kagan’s sons.

    Despite the physical resemblances, the story is there is no family relationship.

    There is an attempt by the White House to prevent or impede access to Kagan’s family, see,

    There is also a photo to be seen of Kagan’s family,

    The question you raised was whether the nominee has any family connections with the Kagans prominent in the Bush administration that would constitute a conflict of interest in her dealings with issues having to do with felonies committed by these guys while in office. Was she in a position to cover up their crimes and make them go away as Solicitor General?

    The political class does not think that the Bush people committed crimes, so prosecution there will not occur. But, if the nominee did not reveal her family connection, that would be another question.

    According to the Slate article, the two Robert Kagans are completely different people.

  22. of course the two Robert Kagan’s are completely different people…

    one is her father… (and possible BROTHER OF Donald Kagan)

    … and the other is the son of Donald Kagan (possibly her cousin)

    I thought I was clear about that.

    The connection that your first article misses is I am saying the original Kagan, father of the Donald and Robert… could be her Grandfather, which the first article fails to even mention.

  23. I think she looks like Lazar Kaganovich myself, her and her “radical” bother Marc.

  24. [can we please stop with the slurs? moderator edit]

  25. I expect her confirmation and dread it. Are there no Christian non-Zionists, true patriots qualified for high position in the US anymore?

  26. Is she part of the international Jewish crime family? Yes, she is! All the Kagans and Cohens and Kaganovichs are related through the Y chromosome.

  27. What “natural state” of war? There might be war at any time as there is night and rain at anytime – what about everywhere where there isn’t war at the same time – doesn’t count? It’s like being black for having 1/32 “black” ascendency, but not being white for having 1/32 “white” ascendency 😛

  28. I’m still not convinced this thing is even human. I feel like vomiting every time I see it’s face.

  29. scary, scary, scary…

  30. The DYKE BITCH should be deported to Israel, where she could resurrect Sodom.

  31. @inthesummerrain 5 unfollowed you between 10AM and 11AM. See who:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: