Climate Change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation

(Just like the NIST report on the Twin Towers and Building 7 or the fraudulent NTSB findings on Flight 77, science is being bastardized in the service of a “greater good” (read as “imperialist globalist agenda”)

by Prof. Christopher Booker, Global Research

Our hopelessly compromised scientific establishment cannot be allowed to get away with a whitewash regarding statistics for global warming.

Continue reading

Cars burn in Geneva as police, protesters clash ahead of WTO conference

by Raw Story

Swiss police fired tear gas and rubber bullets on Saturday at hooded protesters who broke windows and set cars alight during a demonstration ahead of a major WTO conference in Geneva.

Thousands marched in the protest ahead of the World Trade Organisation ministerial meeting beginning on Monday, with the vast majority of demonstrators not participating in the violence.

Continue reading

Kerry Dusts Off the Bin Laden Chestnut for the Greater Imperialist Agenda

by Scott Creighton

Remember John Kerry? He’s the guy who rolled over for the Cheney administration in the 2004 elections even though there were already early signs of significant levels of election fraud in Ohio and other states. Some think his job was to lose in 2004 (just like McCain’s was in 2008) so that the Cheney administration could continue with its agenda.  I agree.

Well, today it is being reported that due to John Kerry’s request, the senate Foreign Relations Committee has prepped a little report that dusts off the old bin-Laden chestnut as more cover for the announcement of the Afghan-surge. Good old John Kerry; always willing to do his part for the American imperialist agenda no matter which political party he serves in the process. Truly a dedicated bi-partisan globalist if there ever was one.

The report asserts that the failure to kill or capture bin Laden at his most vulnerable in December 2001 has had lasting consequences beyond the fate of one man. Bin Laden’s escape laid the foundation for today’s reinvigorated Afghan insurgency and inflamed the internal strife now endangering Pakistan, it says.  MSNBC

It should be noted that MSNBC is owned by GE, a leading contractor in the military industrial complex and a company that has made a great deal of money off of the Global War on Terror.

It should also be noted that there is no evidence to support the claim they just made; what we are up against in Afghanistan, as reported by almost everyone who has actually been there, is a nationalist movement consisted of Afghani resistance fighters who want nothing more than to have the U.S. out of their country. It has nothing to do with al-Qaeda or bin-Laden at all.

But notice how this clever bit of propaganda isn’t limited to providing “left cover” for the administration’s “surge” in Afghanistan… they also manage to incorporate Pakistan into the equation so that now they can help to justify President Obama’s drone bombing campaign in that country as well.

Medicare in Crisis: The Devastating Impacts of a Corporate Health Care Bill

by Shamus Cooke, Global Research

Wading through the endless debate over health care has exhausted the patience of most Americans — the zigzags, obscure language, and long-winded discussion is inherently repulsive.  

But now the dust is starting to settle, and the Congressional  vision for health care in the U.S. is emerging. Instead of being “progressive,” it will amount to a massive, corporate-inspired attack on American workers, the elderly, and the poor.   

After months of confusion and delay, Congress has shipwrecked the popular energy over health care onto the jagged rock of corporate interests. More spectacularly, health care “reform” is being used as an opportunity to greatly advance corporate influence over social spheres long-dedicated to the working-class — seemingly harmless provisions carry with them enormous implications.  

These devils hide in the details of the competing health care bills in Congress; both contain debilitating right-wing policies hidden within a progressive shell. Obama is indeed acting as the agent of change, to the great benefit of the U.S. corporate elite. 

Continue reading

Nobel Peace Prize Winner Won’t Ban Landmines

In 2004, George W. Bush said that we would never sign the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty… this week, President Obama stood opposed to 158 other nations and once again, did Bush’s bidding by refusing to sign it himself.

“President Obama’s decision to cling to antipersonnel mines keeps the US on the wrong side of history and the wrong side of humanity,” said Steve Goose, Arms Division director at Human Rights Watch. “This decision lacks vision, compassion, and basic common sense, and contradicts the Obama administration’s professed emphasis on multilateralism, disarmament, and humanitarian affairs,” said Goose.  Human Rights Watch

Didn’t the Peace Prize committee finally have to resort to saying that they were giving Obama the prize because of what he was “going” to do? Isn’t that what the final justification boiled down too?  I wonder how many crippled children and blown up wedding parties it takes to lose a Peace Prize?

[read the rest at Human Rights Watch website]

Flight 77 Cockpit Door Never Opened? UPDATED – Disinfo Agent Jon Gold Attacks

***UPDATE 2***There is a question as to whether or not this data is even recorded on the B757-2 type aircraft. The B757-3 does, but maybe not the B757-2. Flight 77 was a B757-2.

***UPDATE*** Well, that didn’t take long. I wondered in the following article just how long it would take the disinformation specialist Jon Gold to start to “poo-poo” this new information. True to form, Jon Gold is shitting all over it already.

“Of this document lists the “mandatory parameters” for the FDAU (Flight Data Acquisition Unit) which “receives various discrete, analog and digital parameters from a number of sensors and avionic systems and then routes them to a flight data recorder (FDR) and, if installed, to a Quick Access Recorder (QAR).” I don’t see anything about the cockpit door. I could be wrong. This document from the NTSB regarding Flight 77 says “the Digital Flight Data Acquisition Unit (DFDAU) provides a means of gathering, conditioning, and converting flight data parameters to digital data. In this aircraft, the DFDAU function is performed by the SSFDR (Solid State Flight Data Recorder).” On page 6, it lists the “Parameters Plotted,” and I don’t see anything about a Flight Deck Door. On page 10, it starts listing “Parameters Not Working Or Unconfirmed,” and then on page 13, it does list “FLT DECK DOOR.” However, I don’t know if what is being presented here is accurate anyway. As of right now, this is a “claim.” Good question.  Disinfo Agent Jon Gold

Gold’s twisted logic is remarkable. “I don’t see any mention of the door”, “I don’t see any mention of the door”, “ok, here’s a mention of the door, but it looks like it is wrong…”

Gold is a “LIHOP” supporter meaning they Let It Happen On Purpose. What he won’t tell you is that “LIHOP” is the default fallback position of the globalists who planned 911. You see, with LIHOP they can blame Bush, Cheney, Rice, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Silverstein and others, but the important thing is that the myth of the “islamo fascists” attacking us remains intact. That way they can maintain the all important Global War on Terror.

And that is what Jon Gold brings to the table.



Pilots for 911 Truth is reporting a new development in the study of the Flight Data recorder information they received from the NTSB. Looks like there is a sensor on the flight deck door that records when it is opened and closed. According to researchers in Australia and confirmed by Pilots for 911 Truth, the cockpit door was never opened during the flight. That means that no hijackers could have gotten into the flight deck and hijacked the plane.  The implications for this are varied. If correct, it either means that the analysts that created the fraudulent flight data recorder were so worried about getting the flight path correct that they forgot to work in the technicalities for the actual hijacking, or it means that something else took over that flight (like say a remote piloting system). Either way, if correct, it opens up a lot of avenues for investigation. Can’t wait to see how long it takes Jon Gold and his ilk to start attacking this one.

 The following is from the story on Pilots for 911 Truth;

( – Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence that the reported hijacking aboard American Airlines Flight 77 was impossible to have existed. A data parameter labeled “FLT DECK DOOR”, cross checks with previously decoded data obtained by Pilots For 9/11 Truth from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) through the Freedom Of Information Act.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, American Airlines Flight 77 departed Dulles International Airport bound for Los Angeles at 8:20 am Eastern Time. According to reports and data, a hijacking took place between 08:50:54 and 08:54:11[1] in which the hijackers allegedly crashed the aircraft into the Pentagon at 09:37:45. Reported by CNN, according to Ted Olson, wife Barbara Olson had called him from the reported flight stating, “…all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers…”[2]. However, according to Flight Data provided by the NTSB, the Flight Deck Door was never opened in flight. How were the hijackers able to gain access to the cockpit, remove the pilots, and navigate the aircraft to the Pentagon if the Flight Deck Door remained closed?[3]

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

(I hear, every so often, that “there hasn’t been an attack on our soil since 9/11”, and it always makes me cringe. Sometimes I wonder about people. The anthrax attacks were never solved. They never had to bring their “evidence” to trial or put their key witness, the lying woman who got a new house out of the deal and maybe some breast implants, on the witness stand. Everyone admits the anthrax sent to our congress and members of the press came from our own military labs, yet they claim the case is “closed”.  So closed, in fact, that no-one ever needs to mention it again. Down the memory hole it goes. Mr. Greenwald uses his popular platform to suggest we don’t simply forget about it. Good for him)

by Glenn Greenwald, Salon

Britain is currently engulfed by a probing, controversial investigation into how their Government came to support the invasion of Iraq, replete with evidence that much of what was said at the time by both British and American officials was knowingly false, particularly regarding the unequivocal intention of the Bush administration to attack Iraq for months when they were pretending otherwise.  Yesterday, the British Ambassador to the U.S. in 2002 and 2003, Sir Christopher Meyer (who favored the war), testified before the investigative tribunal and said this:

Meyer said attitudes towards Iraq were influenced to an extent not appreciated by him at the time by the anthrax scare in the US soon after 9/11. US senators and others were sent anthrax spores in the post, a crime that led to the death of five people, prompting policymakers to claim links to Saddam Hussein. . . .

On 9/11 Condoleezza Rice, then the US national security adviser, told Meyer she was in “no doubt: it was an al-Qaida operation” . . . It seemed that Paul Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld’s deputy, argued for retaliation to include Iraq, Meyer said. . . .

But the anthrax scare had “steamed up” policy makers in Bush’s administration and helped swing attitudes against Saddam, who the administration believed had been the last person to use anthrax.

Continue reading