Bentham Editor In Chief Quits after Jones article

(apparently I am not the only one who sees through Prof. Jones’ red-herring; so did the Editor in Chief of the publisher of the paper. Looks like they published this without her knowledge or consent. How does that happen? This is from a rough, Google, translation. A better translation will follow later. There is apparently another member of their staff who resigned as well. Not because it was 9/11 related, but because it is junk science.)

They have printed the article without my authorization else, so when you wrote to me, I did not mean that the article was published. I can not accept, and I have written to Bentham, that I withdraw myself from all activities with them, “says Marie-Paule Pileni, which daily is a professor specializing in nanomaterials at the prestigious Université Pierre et Marie Curie in France .”

[read the rest, here]

read the following written by Scott Creighton starting April 4th 2009 (collection compiled by Jan. from a previous comment. thanks)

Serious Problems with Jim Hoffman’s “A Hypothetical Blasting Scenario” Makes his Recent Essay Far From “Plausible”

Still More Problems with Jim Hoffmans Hypothesis

Some Straight Forward Questions for Steven Jones on the Subject of his Research

The Good Prof. Now Tells Us What To Think and Even What to Say

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: